Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26699837›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology2016

Genetic variation in total number and locations of GnRH neurons identified using in situ hybridization in a wild-source population.

Katherine E Kaugars, Charlotte I Rivers, Margaret S Saha, Paul D Heideman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Timing as a sexually selected trait: the right mate at the right moment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine E KaugarsDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Charlotte I RiversDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Margaret S SahaDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
Paul D HeidemanDepartment of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia.
William & Mary · USWilliams (United States) · US

Funding

Combinatorial contributions of heritable neuroendocrine variation to maleinfertiR15HD068962 · NICHD · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI HEIDEMAN, PAUL D · 2011 to 2011
$378k
Plasticity and Regulation in Xenopus Anterior-Posterior PatterningR15HD077624 · NICHD · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SAHA, MARGARET S · 2013 to 2013
$368k
Neurotransmitter Fate Specification and the Role of Voltage-Gated Calcium ChannelR15NS067566 · NINDS · COLLEGE OF WILLIAM AND MARY · PI SAHA, MARGARET S · 2009 to 2009
$213k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNICHD NIH HHS R15 HD068962NICHD NIH HHS R15HD068962NICHD NIH HHS R15 HD077624NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS067566NINDS NIH HHS R15NS067566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution of brain function in the regulation of physiology may depend in part upon the numbers and locations of neurons. Wild populations of rodents contain natural genetic variation in the inhibition of reproduction by winter-like short photoperiod, and it has been hypothesized that this functional variation might be due in part to heritable variation in the numbers or location of gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. A naturally variable wild-source population of white-footed mice was used to develop lines artificially selected for or against mature gonads in short, winter-like photoperiods. We compared a selection line that is reproductively inhibited in short photoperiod (Responsive) to a line that is weakly inhibited by short photoperiod (Nonresponsive) for differences in counts of neurons identified using in situ hybridization for GnRH mRNA. There was no effect of photoperiod, but there were 60% more GnRH neurons in total in the Nonresponsive selection line than the Responsive selection line. The lines differed specifically in numbers of GnRH neurons in more anterior regions, whereas numbers of GnRH neurons in posterior areas were not statistically different between lines. We compare these results to those of an earlier study that used immunohistochemical labeling for GnRH neurons. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that the selection lines and natural source population contain significant genetic variation in the number and location of GnRH neurons. The variation in GnRH neurons may contribute to functional variation in fertility that occurs in short photoperiods in the laboratory and in the wild source population in winter.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsFemaleFertilityGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneIn Situ HybridizationMaleNeuronsPeromyscusPhotoperiodReproductionSeasonsGonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

Identifiers

PMID26699837
PMCPMC6779586
OpenAlexW2213927637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.