Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26699680›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2016

Liver-Regenerative Transplantation: Regrow and Reset.

A Collin de l'Hortet, K Takeishi, J Guzman-Lepe, K Handa, K Matsubara, K Fukumitsu, K Dorko, S C Presnell, H Yagi, A Soto-Gutierrez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Bioengineering Approaches for Bladder Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Novel technology for liver regeneration and replacement.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

A Collin de l'HortetDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
K TakeishiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
J Guzman-LepeDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
K HandaDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
K MatsubaraDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
K FukumitsuDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
K DorkoOrganovo Holdings Inc., San Diego, CA.
S C PresnellOrganovo Holdings Inc., San Diego, CA.
H YagiDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan.
A Soto-GutierrezDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
University of Pittsburgh · USKeio University · JPOrganovo (United States) · USKyoto University · JP

Funding

Measuring the Temporal-Spatial Responses of Dormancy and Drug Resistance in a Human Breast Cancer Metastatic Niche within a Liver-on-a-Chip Microphysiological PlatformUH3TR000503 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TAYLOR, D. LANSING · 2014 to 2016
$6.2M
Mini-Livers Derived from Human IPS Cells for Modeling Steatosis and TherapyR01DK099257 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NAGRATH, DEEPAK, SOTO-GUTIERREZ, ALEJANDRO · 2014 to 2024
$3.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UH3 TR000503NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplantation, either a partial liver from a living or deceased donor or a whole liver from a deceased donor, is the only curative therapy for severe end-stage liver disease. Only one-third of those on the liver transplant waiting list will be transplanted, and the demand for livers is projected to increase 23% in the next 20 years. Consequently, organ availability is an absolute constraint on the number of liver transplants that can be performed. Regenerative therapies aim to enhance liver tissue repair and regeneration by any means available (cell repopulation, tissue engineering, biomaterials, proteins, small molecules, and genes). Recent experimental work suggests that liver repopulation and engineered liver tissue are best suited to the task if an unlimited availability of functional induced pluripotent stem (iPS)-derived liver cells can be achieved. The derivation of iPS cells by reprogramming cell fate has opened up new lines of investigation, for instance, the generation of iPS-derived xenogeneic organs or the possibility of simply inducing the liver to reprogram its own hepatocyte function after injury. We reviewed current knowledge about liver repopulation, generation of engineered livers and reprogramming of liver function. We also discussed the numerous barriers that have to be overcome for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationAnimalsHumansLiver DiseasesLiver RegenerationTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID26699680
PMCPMC4874858
OpenAlexW2206782596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.