Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26699602›Full record

ReviewAmerican heart journal2016

Predictable and SuStainable Implementation of National Cardiovascular Registries (PASSION) infrastructure: A think tank report from Medical Device Epidemiological Network Initiative (MDEpiNet).

Emily P Zeitler, Sana M Al-Khatib, Joseph P Drozda, Larry G Kessler, Ajay J Kirtane, David F Kong, John Laschinger, Danica Marinac-Dabic, Marie-Claude Morice, Terrie Reed and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American heart journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. One-Year Follow-Up of Vascular Intervention Trials Disrupted by the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Use-Case landscape.Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Emily P ZeitlerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Sana M Al-KhatibDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Joseph P DrozdaMercy Health, Chesterfield, MO.
Larry G KesslerUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Ajay J KirtaneHerbert and Sandi Feinberg Interventional Cardiology and Heart Valve Center at Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY.
David F KongDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
John LaschingerUS Food Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Danica Marinac-DabicUS Food Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Marie-Claude MoriceEuropean Cardiovascular Research Center, Massy, France.
Terrie ReedUS Food Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD.
Art SedrakyanWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
Kenneth M SteinBoston Scientific, St Paul, MN.
James TchengDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Mitchell W KrucoffDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC. Electronic address: mitchell.krucoff@duke.edu.
MDEpiNet

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The MDEpiNet is a public-private partnership between the US Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health and participating partners. The PASSION program is an MDEpiNet-sponsored program that aims to demonstrate the goals of MDEpiNet by using cardiovascular medical device registries to bridge evidence gaps across the medical device total product life cycle. To this end, a PASSION Think Tank meeting took place in October 2014 in Silver Spring, MD, to facilitate discussion between stakeholders about the successes, challenges, and future novel applications of medical device registries, with particular emphasis on identifying pilot projects. Participants spanned a broad range of groups including patients, device manufacturers, regulators, physicians/academicians, professional societies, providers, and payers. The meeting focus included 4 areas of cardiovascular medicine intended to cultivate interest in 4 MDEpiNet disease-specific/device-specific working groups: coronary intervention, electrophysiology, valvular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. In addition, more general issues applying to registry-based infrastructure and analytical methodologies for assessing device benefit/risk were considered to provide context for the working groups as PASSION programs going forward. This article summarizes the discussions at the meeting and the future directions of the PASSION program.

Indexed as

RegistriesCardiovascular DiseasesCongresses as TopicHumansInterprofessional RelationsRisk AssessmentSafety ManagementUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26699602
PMCPMC4692177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.