ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2015
Fractionated SRT using VMAT and Gamma Knife for brain metastases and gliomas--a planning study.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Develop a novel non-coplanar trajectory optimization algorithm for an efficient 4pi spot-scanning proton Arc (SPArcMedical physics · 2026Article
- Integrating spot-scanning proton arc therapy with functional avoidance strategies to reduce pulmonary toxicity.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Tumor-driven SRS VMAT planning: Regression models for intermediate and low dose spillage.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Innovations in intraoperative therapies in neurosurgical oncology: a narrative review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Is there a volume threshold of brain metastases for Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy?Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2021Article
- Dosimetric comparison of Gamma Knife® IconJournal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2021Article
- Stereotactic radiotherapy of appropriately selected meningiomas and metastatic brain tumor beds with gamma knife icon versus volumetric modulated arc therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020Article
- Selection of prescription isodose line for brain metastases treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2019Article
- Individualized automated planning for dose bath reduction in robotic radiosurgery for benign tumors.PloS one · 2019Article
- Gamma Knife and volumetric modulated arc therapy stereotactic radiosurgery plan quality and OAR sparing comparison for pituitary adenomas and vestibular schwannomas.Journal of radiosurgery and SBRT · 2018Article
- Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency for Radiosurgery to Multiple Brain Metastases: Non-Coplanar RapidArc vs. Gamma Knife.Frontiers in oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery using Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerators has been used for decades to treat brain tumors in one fraction. A new positioning system, Extend™, was introduced by Elekta AB for fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with GK. Another option for fractionated SRT is advanced planning and delivery using linacs and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). This project aims to assess the performance of GK Extend™ for delivering fractionated SRT by comparing GK treatments plans for brain targets performed using Leksell GammaPlan (LGP) with VMAT treatment plans. Several targets were considered for the planning: simulated metastasis- and glioma-like targets surrounding an organ at risk (OAR), as well as three clinical cases of metastases. Physical parameters such as conformity, gradient index, dose to OARs, and brain volume receiving doses above the threshold associated with risk of damaging healthy tissue, were determined and compared for the treatment plans. The results showed that GK produced better dose distributions for target volumes below 15 cm3, while VMAT results in better dose conformity to the target and lower doses to the OARs in case of fractionated treatments for large or irregular volumes. The volume receiving doses above a threshold associated with increased risk of damage to normal brain tissue was also smaller for VMAT. The GK consistently performed better than VMAT in producing a lower dose-bath to the brain. The above is subjected only to margin-dependent fractionated radiotherapy (CTV/PTV). The results of this study could lead to clinically significant decisions regarding the choice of the radiotherapy technique for brain targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.