Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26698853›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Preliminary Genomic Characterization of Ten Hardwood Tree Species from Multiplexed Low Coverage Whole Genome Sequencing.

Margaret Staton, Teodora Best, Sudhir Khodwekar, Sandra Owusu, Tao Xu, Yi Xu, Tara Jennings, Richard Cronn, A Kathiravetpilla Arumuganathan, Mark Coggeshall and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development of Microsatellite Markers forPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. Strategies of tolerance reflected in two North American maple genomes.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Margaret StatonDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
Teodora BestThe Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.
Sudhir KhodwekarSchool of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States of America.
Sandra OwusuSchool of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States of America.
Tao XuDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Yi XuDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Tara JenningsDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
Richard CronnDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.
A Kathiravetpilla ArumuganathanFlow Cytometry and Imaging Core Lab, Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Mark CoggeshallDepartment of Forestry, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States of America.
Oliver GailingSchool of Forest Resources and Environmental Science, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, United States of America.
Haiying LiangDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, United States of America.
Jeanne Romero-SeversonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States of America.
Scott SchlarbaumDepartment of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States of America.
John E CarlsonThe Schatz Center for Tree Molecular Genetics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forest health issues are on the rise in the United States, resulting from introduction of alien pests and diseases, coupled with abiotic stresses related to climate change. Increasingly, forest scientists are finding genetic/genomic resources valuable in addressing forest health issues. For a set of ten ecologically and economically important native hardwood tree species representing a broad phylogenetic spectrum, we used low coverage whole genome sequencing from multiplex Illumina paired ends to economically profile their genomic content. For six species, the genome content was further analyzed by flow cytometry in order to determine the nuclear genome size. Sequencing yielded a depth of 0.8X to 7.5X, from which in silico analysis yielded preliminary estimates of gene and repetitive sequence content in the genome for each species. Thousands of genomic SSRs were identified, with a clear predisposition toward dinucleotide repeats and AT-rich repeat motifs. Flanking primers were designed for SSR loci for all ten species, ranging from 891 loci in sugar maple to 18,167 in redbay. In summary, we have demonstrated that useful preliminary genome information including repeat content, gene content and useful SSR markers can be obtained at low cost and time input from a single lane of Illumina multiplex sequence.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeDNA, PlantGenome, PlantGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNATreesDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID26698853
PMCPMC4689444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.