ArticleBMC genetics2015
Across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection outperforms GBLUP.
Article in BMC genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of QTL number, heritability and reference population size on the benefit of machine learning models over GBLUP in genomic prediction.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genomic predictions for growth and feed efficiency traits in a duck breeding population.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- AdaptiveGS: an explainable genomic selection framework based on adaptive stacking ensemble machine learning.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genomic prediction with kinship-based multiple kernel learning produces hypothesis on the underlying inheritance mechanisms of phenotypic traits.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Genomic Prediction for Germplasm Improvement Through Inter-Heterotic-Group Line Crossing in Maize.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of genomic selection models using whole genome sequence data and functional annotation in Belgian Blue cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Benchmarking of feed-forward neural network models for genomic prediction of quantitative traits in pigs.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
- Accuracy of genomic prediction using multiple Atlantic salmon populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Genomic Prediction of Growth Traits in Yorkshire Pigs of Different Reference Group Sizes Using Different Estimated Breeding Value Models.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Strategies to improve genomic predictions for 35 duck carcass traits in an FJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Stacked kinship CNN vs. GBLUP for genomic predictions of additive and complex continuous phenotypes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Effects of common full-sib families on accuracy of genomic prediction for tagging weight in striped catfishFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Genetic Basis for Resistance Against Viral Nervous Necrosis: GWAS and Potential of Genomic Prediction Explored in Farmed European Sea Bass (Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Factors affecting accuracy of estimated effective number of chromosome segments for numerically small breeds.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2021Article
- Article
- Estimation of Molecular Pairwise Relatedness in Autopolyploid Crops.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Efficient genomic prediction based on whole-genome sequence data using split-and-merge Bayesian variable selection.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
- An Equation to Predict the Accuracy of Genomic Values by Combining Data from Multiple Traits, Populations, or Environments.Genetics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of information across populations is an attractive approach to increase the accuracy of genomic prediction for numerically small populations. However, accuracies of across population genomic prediction, in which reference and selection individuals are from different populations, are currently disappointing. It has been shown for within population genomic prediction that Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP models when the number of QTL underlying the trait is low. Therefore, our objective was to identify across population genomic prediction scenarios in which Bayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP in terms of prediction accuracy. In this study, high density genotype information of 1033 Holstein Friesian, 105 Groningen White Headed, and 147 Meuse-Rhine-Yssel cows were used. Phenotypes were simulated using two changing variables: (1) the number of QTL underlying the trait (3000, 300, 30, 3), and (2) the correlation between allele substitution effects of QTL across populations, i.e. the genetic correlation of the simulated trait between the populations (1.0, 0.8, 0.4).
resultsThe accuracy obtained by the Bayesian variable selection model was depending on the number of QTL underlying the trait, with a higher accuracy when the number of QTL was lower. This trend was more pronounced for across population genomic prediction than for within population genomic prediction. It was shown that Bayesian variable selection models have an advantage over GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was small. This advantage disappeared when the number of QTL underlying the simulated trait was large. The point where the accuracy of Bayesian variable selection and GBLUP became similar was approximately the point where the number of QTL was equal to the number of independent chromosome segments (M e ) across the populations.
conclusionBayesian variable selection models outperform GBLUP when the number of QTL underlying the trait is smaller than M e . Across populations, M e is considerably larger than within populations. So, it is more likely to find a number of QTL underlying a trait smaller than M e across populations than within population. Therefore Bayesian variable selection models can help to improve the accuracy of across population genomic prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.