Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26698303›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Effects of Pre-Natal Vitamin D Supplementation with Partial Correction of Vitamin D Deficiency on Early Life Healthcare Utilisation: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Megan Griffiths, Stephen Goldring, Chris Griffiths, Seif O Shaheen, Adrian Martineau, Louise Cross, Stephen Robinson, John O Warner, Angela Devine, Robert J Boyle

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Megan GriffithsDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen GoldringDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Chris GriffithsCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Seif O ShaheenCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian MartineauCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Louise CrossCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen RobinsonDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
John O WarnerDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Angela DevineCentre for Primary Care and Public Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Robert J BoyleDepartment of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSome observational studies have suggested that higher prenatal Vitamin D intake may be associated with improved health outcomes in childhood. However there have been mixed results in this area with some negative studies, especially for effects on atopic and respiratory outcomes. We examined the effect of prenatal Vitamin D on healthcare utilisation in the first three years of life.

methodsIn an ethnically stratified randomised controlled trial conducted at St Mary's Hospital London, 180 women at 27 weeks gestation were allocated to no Vitamin D, 800 IU ergocalciferol daily until delivery, or a single oral bolus of 200,000 IU cholecalciferol. Participants were randomised in blocks of 15 using computer-generated numbers and investigators were blinded to group assignment. Supplementation increased maternal and cord blood 25(OH) vitamin D concentrations, but levels remained lower than current recommendations. Primary health economic outcome was overall cost of unscheduled healthcare utilisation in the first three years of life as documented in the child's electronic health record. Secondary outcomes included cost attributable to: primary and secondary healthcare visits, respiratory and atopic complaints, cost in years 1, 2 and 3 of life and cost and frequency of prescribed medication. All costs were calculated as pounds sterling. Differences between groups were analysed using unpaired t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, and analysis of variance for adjusted analyses.

resultsWe assessed 99/180 (55%) complete electronic health records, control (n = 31), daily (n = 36) and bolus (n = 32). We found no difference in total healthcare utilisation costs between the control and daily (mean difference in costs in pounds sterling 1.02, 95%CI -1.60, 1.65; adjusted 1.07, 95%CI -1.62, 1.86) or control and bolus groups (mean difference -1.58, 95%CI -2.63, 1.06; adjusted -1.40, 95%CI -2.45, 1.24). There were no adverse effects of supplementation reported during the trial.

conclusionsWe found no evidence that prenatal vitamin D supplementation from 27 weeks gestation to delivery, at doses which failed to completely correct maternal vitamin D deficiency, influence overall healthcare utilisation in children in the first 3 years.

trial registrationControlled-Trials.com ISRCTN68645785.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsChild, PreschoolFemaleFetal Nutrition DisordersHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalePregnancyPrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaTreatment OutcomeVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID26698303
PMCPMC4689556
OpenAlexW2202792305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.