ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2015
Using 4D Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Validate Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Case Study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemodynamic Analysis in Aortic Dilatation after Arterial Switch Operation for Patients with Transposition of Great Arteries Using Computational Fluid Dynamics.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2025Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of hemodynamic parameters in left coronary artery bifurcation: A CFD approach.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Image2Flow: A proof-of-concept hybrid image and graph convolutional neural network for rapid patient-specific pulmonary artery segmentation and CFD flow field calculation from 3D cardiac MRI data.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A 3D scaling law for supravalvular aortic stenosis suited for stethoscopic auscultations.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Correct Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Reduces Stagnant Blood Flow and the Risk of Thrombus Formation: A Proof-of-Concept Experimental Study Using 4D Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Korean journal of radiology · 2023Article
- Shape-driven deep neural networks for fast acquisition of aortic 3D pressure and velocity flow fields.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Validation of the Reduced Unified Continuum Formulation Against In Vitro 4D-Flow MRI.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Location matters: Offset in tissue-engineered vascular graft implantation location affects wall shear stress in porcine models.JTCVS open · 2022Article
- The impact of 4D-Flow MRI spatial resolution on patient-specific CFD simulations of the thoracic aorta.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Virtual Reality Cardiac Surgical Planning Software (CorFix) for Designing Patient-Specific Vascular Grafts: Development and Pilot Usability Study.JMIR cardio · 2022Article
- Impact of extra-anatomical bypass on coarctation fluid dynamics using patient-specific lumped parameter and Lattice Boltzmann modeling.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Altered hemodynamics by 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance predict exercise intolerance in repaired coarctation of the aorta: an in vitro study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2021Article
- Heritability of haemodynamics in the ascending aorta.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Current and future applications of 3D printing in congenital cardiology and cardiac surgery.The British journal of radiology · 2019Article
- Model-Based Therapy Planning Allows Prediction of Haemodynamic Outcome after Aortic Valve Replacement.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A Mock Circulatory System Incorporating a Compliant 3D-Printed Anatomical Model to Investigate Pulmonary Hemodynamics.Artificial organs · 2017Article
- Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation?Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) can have a complementary predictive role alongside the exquisite visualization capabilities of 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. In order to exploit these capabilities (e.g., for decision-making), it is necessary to validate computational models against real world data. In this study, we sought to acquire 4D CMR flow data in a controllable, experimental setup and use these data to validate a corresponding computational model. We applied this paradigm to a case of congenital heart disease, namely, transposition of the great arteries (TGA) repaired with arterial switch operation. For this purpose, a mock circulatory loop compatible with the CMR environment was constructed and two detailed aortic 3D models (i.e., one TGA case and one normal aortic anatomy) were tested under realistic hemodynamic conditions, acquiring 4D CMR flow. The same 3D domains were used for multi-scale CFD simulations, whereby the remainder of the mock circulatory system was appropriately summarized with a lumped parameter network. Boundary conditions of the simulations mirrored those measured in vitro. Results showed a very good quantitative agreement between experimental and computational models in terms of pressure (overall maximum % error = 4.4% aortic pressure in the control anatomy) and flow distribution data (overall maximum % error = 3.6% at the subclavian artery outlet of the TGA model). Very good qualitative agreement could also be appreciated in terms of streamlines, throughout the cardiac cycle. Additionally, velocity vectors in the ascending aorta revealed less symmetrical flow in the TGA model, which also exhibited higher wall shear stress in the anterior ascending aorta.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.