Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26697402›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2015

DNA Damage Response Proteins and Oxygen Modulate Prostaglandin E2 Growth Factor Release in Response to Low and High LET Ionizing Radiation.

Christopher P Allen, Walter Tinganelli, Neelam Sharma, Jingyi Nie, Cory Sicard, Francesco Natale, Maurice King, Steven B Keysar, Antonio Jimeno, Yoshiya Furusawa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. P2X7 receptor deletion suppresses γ-radiation-induced hyposalivation.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher P AllenDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Walter TinganelliGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH , Darmstadt , Germany ; Research Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan.
Neelam SharmaDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Jingyi NieDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Cory SicardDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Francesco NataleGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH , Darmstadt , Germany.
Maurice KingDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Steven B KeysarDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, CO , USA.
Antonio JimenoDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine , Aurora, CO , USA.
Yoshiya FurusawaResearch Development and Support Center, National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan ; Research Center for Radiation Protection, National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan.
Ryuichi OkayasuResearch Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan.
Akira FujimoriResearch Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences , Chiba , Japan.
Marco DuranteGSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH , Darmstadt , Germany.
Jac A NickoloffDepartment of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences, Colorado State University , Fort Collins, CO , USA.
Colorado State University · USGSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research · DEUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

METNASE ROLES IN NHEJ, DNA INTEGRATION AND TRANSLOCATIONR01GM084020 · NIGMS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI NICKOLOFF, JAC A · 2009 to 2016
$2.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common cancer therapies employ chemicals or radiation that damage DNA. Cancer and normal cells respond to DNA damage by activating complex networks of DNA damage sensor, signal transducer, and effector proteins that arrest cell cycle progression, and repair damaged DNA. If damage is severe enough, the DNA damage response (DDR) triggers programed cell death by apoptosis or other pathways. Caspase 3 is a protease that is activated upon damage and triggers apoptosis, and production of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), a potent growth factor that can enhance growth of surviving cancer cells leading to accelerated tumor repopulation. Thus, dying tumor cells can promote growth of surviving tumor cells, a pathway aptly named Phoenix Rising. In the present study, we surveyed Phoenix Rising responses in a variety of normal and established cancer cell lines, and in cancer cell lines freshly derived from patients. We demonstrate that IR induces a Phoenix Rising response in many, but not all cell lines, and that PGE2 production generally correlates with enhanced growth of cells that survive irradiation, and of unirradiated cells co-cultured with irradiated cells. We show that PGE2 production is stimulated by low and high LET ionizing radiation, and can be enhanced or suppressed by inhibitors of key DDR proteins. PGE2 is produced downstream of caspase 3 and the cyclooxygenases COX1 and COX2, and we show that the pan COX1-2 inhibitor indomethacin blocks IR-induced PGE2 production in the presence or absence of DDR inhibitors. COX1-2 require oxygen for catalytic activity, and we further show that PGE2 production is markedly suppressed in cells cultured under low (1%) oxygen concentration. Thus, Phoenix Rising is most likely to cause repopulation of tumors with relatively high oxygen, but not in hypoxic tumors. This survey lays a foundation for future studies to further define tumor responses to radiation and inhibitors of the DDR and Phoenix Rising to enhance the efficacy of radiotherapy with the ultimate goal of precision medicine informed by deep understanding of specific tumor responses to radiation and adjunct chemotherapy targeting key factors in the DDR and Phoenix Rising pathways.

Indexed as

apoptosiscaspaseDNA damage responsegrowth factorradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID26697402
PMCPMC4670845
OpenAlexW2189893694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.