Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26697145›Full record

ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2015

Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effects of Different Concentrations of Triple Antibiotic Paste on Mature Biofilm of Enterococcus faecalis.

Mohammad Frough Reyhani, Saeed Rahimi, Zahra Fathi, Sahar Shakouie, Amin Salem Milani, Mohammad Hossein Soroush Barhaghi, Javad Shokri

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Antimicrobial effects of different concentrations of simvastatin versus triple antibiotic paste onJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Intracanal Medicaments againstInternational journal of dentistry · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad Frough ReyhaniDental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Associate Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Saeed RahimiDental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ; Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Zahra FathiPostgraduate Student, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Sahar ShakouieAssistant Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Amin Salem MilaniAssistant Professor, Department of Endodontic, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Mohammad Hossein Soroush BarhaghiAssistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Javad ShokriAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims. Triple antibiotic paste (TAP) is widely used in endodontics for root canal disinfection, particularly in regenerative procedures. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of different concentrations of TAP at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week intervals on mature Enterococcus faecalis biofilm. Materials and methods. A total of 287 extracted one-rooted human central incisors were infected with E. faecalis ATCC 29212 after removing the crown and preparation. The root canal space was filled with one of the 0.01-, 0.1-, 1-, 10-, 100-, and 1000-mg/mL concentrations of TAP or normal saline (control). The root canal dentin was sampled after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. The dentinal shavings were cultured on Mueller-Hinton agar plates after serial dilutions. The classic colony-forming unit (CFU) counting technique was used to determine remaining bacterial counts. Data were analyzed by using the two-way ANOVA, post hoc Tukey tests and one-way ANOVA (P<0.05). Results. TAP completely eliminated E. faecalis biofilms at all the intervals at concentrations of 1000, 100, and 10 mg/mL, whereas 1-, 0.1-, and 0.01-mg/mL TAP resulted in significant reduction of CFU means compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the four time intervals. Conclusion. Use of lower concentrations of TAP at short term could eradicate E. faecalis biofilm and decrease high-concentration side effects.

Indexed as

Anti-bacterial agentsEnterococcus faecalisroot canal medicamentstriple antibiotic paste

Identifiers

PMID26697145
PMCPMC4682009
OpenAlexW1916161555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.