Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26697103›Full record

ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2015

Designing minimal microbial strains of desired functionality using a genetic algorithm.

Govind Nair, Christian Jungreuthmayer, Michael Hanscho, Jürgen Zanghellini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Govind NairDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria ; Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Christian JungreuthmayerDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria ; Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Michael HanschoDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria ; Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.
Jürgen ZanghelliniDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria ; Austrian Centre of Industrial Biotechnology, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rational, in silico prediction of gene-knockouts to turn organisms into efficient cell factories is an essential and computationally challenging task in metabolic engineering. Elementary flux mode analysis in combination with constraint minimal cut sets is a particularly powerful method to identify optimal engineering targets, which will force an organism into the desired metabolic state. Given an engineering objective, it is theoretically possible, although computationally impractical, to find the best minimal intervention strategies.

resultsWe developed a genetic algorithm (GA-MCS) to quickly find many (near) optimal intervention strategies while overcoming the above mentioned computational burden. We tested our algorithm on Escherichia coli metabolic networks of three different sizes to find intervention strategies satisfying three different engineering objectives.

conclusionsWe show that GA-MCS finds all practically relevant targets for any (non)-linear engineering objective. Our algorithm also found solutions comparable to previously published results. We show that for large networks optimal solutions are found within a fraction of the time used for a complete enumeration.

Indexed as

Elementary flux modesMetabolic networksMinimal cut setsStrain optimizationSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26697103
PMCPMC4687386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.