Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26697035›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Functional Divergence of APETALA1 and FRUITFULL is due to Changes in both Regulation and Coding Sequence.

Elizabeth W McCarthy, Abeer Mohamed, Amy Litt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparative Analysis of Floral Transcriptomes inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of pea mutants reveals the conserved role ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Floral Homeotic Factors: A Question of Specificity.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comprehensive Analysis of FiveInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Expression patterns ofEvoDevo · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth W McCarthyDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside Riverside, CA, USA.
Abeer MohamedDepartment of Agricultural Botany, Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University Alexandria, Egypt.
Amy LittDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside Riverside, CA, USA.
University of California, Riverside · USAlexandria University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplications are prevalent in plants, and functional divergence subsequent to duplication may be linked with the occurrence of novel phenotypes in plant evolution. Here, we examine the functional divergence of Arabidopsis thaliana APETALA1 (AP1) and FRUITFULL (FUL), which arose via a duplication correlated with the origin of the core eudicots. Both AP1 and FUL play a role in floral meristem identity, but AP1 is required for the formation of sepals and petals whereas FUL is involved in cauline leaf and fruit development. AP1 and FUL are expressed in mutually exclusive domains but also differ in sequence, with unique conserved motifs in the C-terminal domains of the proteins that suggest functional differentiation. To determine whether the functional divergence of AP1 and FUL is due to changes in regulation or changes in coding sequence, we performed promoter swap experiments, in which FUL was expressed in the AP1 domain in the ap1 mutant and vice versa. Our results show that FUL can partially substitute for AP1, and AP1 can partially substitute for FUL; thus, the functional divergence between AP1 and FUL is due to changes in both regulation and coding sequence. We also mutated AP1 and FUL conserved motifs to determine if they are required for protein function and tested the ability of these mutated proteins to interact in yeast with known partners. We found that these motifs appear to play at best a minor role in protein function and dimerization capability, despite being strongly conserved. Our results suggest that the functional differentiation of these two paralogous key transcriptional regulators involves both differences in regulation and in sequence; however, sequence changes in the form of unique conserved motifs do not explain the differences observed.

Indexed as

APETALA1conserved protein motifsFRUITFULLfunctional divergencegene duplicationMADS box genes

Identifiers

PMID26697035
PMCPMC4667048
OpenAlexW2197590584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.