Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26696987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Single-Cell Analysis of Growth and Cell Division of the Anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough.

Anouchka Fievet, Adrien Ducret, Tâm Mignot, Odile Valette, Lydia Robert, Romain Pardoux, Alain R Dolla, Corinne Aubert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Microbial single-cell applications under anoxic conditions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. OrpR is a σMolecular microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The bacterial MrpScientific reports · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Sizing up the bacterial cell cycle.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anouchka FievetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Adrien DucretCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Tâm MignotCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Odile ValetteCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Lydia RobertINRA, UMR1319 Micalis Jouy-en-Josas, France ; AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis Jouy-en-Josas, France.
Romain PardouxCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Alain R DollaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Corinne AubertCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne UMR 7283, Aix Marseille Université Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRLaboratoire de Chimie Bactérienne · FRAgroParisTech · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have seen significant progress in understanding basic bacterial cell cycle properties such as cell growth and cell division. While characterization and regulation of bacterial cell cycle is quite well-documented in the case of fast growing aerobic model organisms, no data has been so far reported for anaerobic bacteria. This lack of information in anaerobic microorganisms can mainly be explained by the absence of molecular and cellular tools such as single cell microscopy and fluorescent probes usable for anaerobes and essential to study cellular events and/or subcellular localization of the actors involved in cell cycle. In this study, single-cell microscopy has been adapted to study for the first time, in real time, the cell cycle of a bacterial anaerobe, Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough (DvH). This single-cell analysis provides mechanistic insights into the cell division cycle of DvH, which seems to be governed by the recently discussed so-called incremental model that generates remarkably homogeneous cell sizes. Furthermore, cell division was reversibly blocked during oxygen exposure. This may constitute a strategy for anaerobic cells to cope with transient exposure to oxygen that they may encounter in their natural environment, thereby contributing to their aerotolerance. This study lays the foundation for the first molecular, single-cell assay that will address factors that cannot otherwise be resolved in bulk assays and that will allow visualization of a wide range of molecular mechanisms within living anaerobic cells.

Indexed as

anaerobic bacteriacell divisionDesulfovibriooxygen stress adaptationsulfate-reducing bacteria

Identifiers

PMID26696987
PMCPMC4672049
OpenAlexW2219461990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.