Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26696970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2015

Comprehensive Characterization of Escherichia coli O104:H4 Isolated from Patients in the Netherlands.

Mithila Ferdous, Kai Zhou, Richard F de Boer, Alexander W Friedrich, Anna M D Kooistra-Smid, John W A Rossen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Shiga-Toxin-Producing Strains ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Whole genome sequencing reveals high clonal diversity ofAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mithila FerdousDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Kai ZhouDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands ; State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University Hangzhou, China ; Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases Hangzhou, China.
Richard F de BoerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Certe-Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Groningen, Netherlands.
Alexander W FriedrichDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Anna M D Kooistra-SmidDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands ; Department of Medical Microbiology, Certe-Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Groningen, Netherlands.
John W A RossenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLCerte · NLState Key Laboratory of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2011, a Shiga toxin-producing Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli (EAEC Stx2a+) O104:H4 strain caused a serious outbreak of acute gastroenteritis and hemolytic-uremic syndrome (HUS) in Germany. In 2013, E. coli O104:H4 isolates were obtained from a patient with HUS and her friend showing only gastrointestinal complaints. The antimicrobial resistance and virulence profiles of these isolates together with three EAEC Stx2a+ O104:H4 isolates from 2011 were determined and compared. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed for detailed characterization and to determine genetic relationship of the isolates. Four additional genomes of EAEC Stx2a+ O104:H4 isolates of 2009 and 2011 available on NCBI were included in the virulence and phylogenetic analysis. All E. coli O104:H4 isolates tested were positive for stx2a, aatA, and terD but were negative for escV. All, except one 2011 isolate, were positive for aggR and were therefore considered EAEC. The EAEC Stx2a+ O104:H4 isolates of 2013 belonged to sequence type (ST) ST678 as the 2011 isolates and showed slightly different resistance and virulence patterns compared to the 2011 isolates. Core-genome phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolates of 2013 formed a separate cluster from the isolates of 2011 and 2009 by 27 and 20 different alleles, respectively. In addition, only a one-allele difference was found between the isolate of the HUS-patient and that of her friend. Our study shows that EAEC Stx2a+ O104:H4 strains highly similar to the 2011 outbreak clone in their core genome are still circulating necessitating proper surveillance to prevent further outbreaks with these potentially pathogenic strains. In addition, WGS not only provided a detailed characterization of the isolates but its high discriminatory power also enabled us to discriminate the 2013 isolates from the isolates of 2009 and 2011 expediting the use of WGS in public health services to rapidly apply proper infection control strategies.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceenterohemorrhagic E. coli –EHEChemolytic uremic syndromeoutbreakphylogenetic analysisShiga toxin-producing E. coli –STECwhole genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26696970
PMCPMC4667096
OpenAlexW2224442483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.