ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
NERI: network-medicine based integrative approach for disease gene prioritization by relative importance.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in gene regulatory networks during mid-gestational brain development.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Thrombosis-related circulating miR-16-5p is associated with disease severity in patients hospitalised for COVID-19.RNA biology · 2022Article
- ACE2 Interaction Networks in COVID-19: A Physiological Framework for Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Cardiovascular Risk Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.An international journal on information fusion · 2019Article
- Systems Bioinformatics: increasing precision of computational diagnostics and therapeutics through network-based approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Assessment of complementarity of WGCNA and NERI results for identification of modules associated to schizophrenia spectrum disorders.PloS one · 2019Article
- Stratification of candidate genes for Parkinson's disease using weighted protein-protein interaction network analysis.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- MGOGP: a gene module-based heuristic algorithm for cancer-related gene prioritization.BMC bioinformatics · 2018Article
- Comparative Protein Interaction Network Analysis Identifies Shared and Distinct Functions for the Human ROCO Proteins.Proteomics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex diseases are characterized as being polygenic and multifactorial, so this poses a challenge regarding the search for genes related to them. With the advent of high-throughput technologies for genome sequencing, gene expression measurements (transcriptome), and protein-protein interactions, complex diseases have been sistematically investigated. Particularly, Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) networks have been used to prioritize genes related to complex diseases according to its topological features. However, PPI networks are affected by ascertainment bias, in which more studied proteins tend to have more connections, degrading the results quality. Additionally, methods using only PPI networks can provide only static and non-specific results, since the topologies of these networks are not specific of a given disease.
resultsThe goal of this work is to develop a methodology that integrates PPI networks with disease specific data sources, such as GWAS and gene expression, to find genes more specific of a given complex disease. After the integration of PPI networks and gene expression data, the resulting network is used to connect genes related to the disease through the shortest paths that have the greatest concordance between their gene expressions. Both case and control expression data are used separately and, at the end, the most altered genes between the two conditions are selected. To evaluate the method, schizophrenia was adopted as case study.
conclusionResults show that the proposed method successfully retrieves differentially coexpressed genes in two conditions, while avoiding the bias from literature. Moreover we were able to achieve a greater concordance in the selection of important genes from different microarray studies of the same disease and to produce a more specific gene set related to the studied disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.