Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26696408›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2017

The Impact of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages on Young Adults' Sexual Decision Making: An Experimental Study.

Kathryn Macapagal, Erick Janssen, Margaret Matson, Peter R Finn, Julia R Heiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effectiveness of message framing on pulmonary rehabilitation behavior for lung cancer surgery patients: Randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Designing a Needs-Oriented Psychological Intervention for Chinese Women Undergoing an Abortion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathryn MacapagalDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 625 North Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. kathryn.macapagal@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1208-6097
Erick JanssenThe Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Margaret MatsonRichard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Peter R FinnDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Julia R HeimanThe Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Attention-biases and hot cognition in drug dependenceR01DA017924 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI FINN, PETER R · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute-T32 Program TL1TL1RR025759 · NCRR · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2008 to 2011
$710k
Self-Regulation & Attentional Mechanisms of Sexual Risk Taking in Young DrinkersF31MH090895 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MACAPAGAL, KATHRYN ROSE · 2010 to 2012
$75k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR025759NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA017924NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH090895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Messages that frame a target behavior in terms of its benefits (gain frame) or costs (loss frame) have been widely and successfully used for health promotion and risk reduction. However, the impact of framed messages on decisions to have sex and sexual risk, as well as moderators of these effects, has remained largely unexplored. We used a computerized laboratory task to test the effects of framed messages about condom use on young adults' sexual decision making. Participants (N = 127) listened to both gain- and loss-framed messages and rated their intentions to have sex with partners who posed a high and low risk for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). The effects of message frame, partner risk, participant gender, ability to adopt the messages, and message presentation order on intentions to have sex were examined. Intentions to have sex with high-risk partners significantly decreased after the loss-framed message, but not after the gain-framed message, and intentions to have sex increased for participants who received the gain-framed message first. Yet, participants found it easier to adopt the gain-framed message. Results suggest that loss-framed messages may be particularly effective in reducing intentions to have sex with partners who might pose a higher risk for STIs, and that message presentation order may alter the relative effectiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages on sexual decision making. Future studies should examine the precise conditions under which gain- and loss-framed messages can promote healthy sexual behaviors and reduce sexual risk behaviors.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansMaleRiskSafe SexYoung AdultMessage framingSexual decision makingSexual risk takingYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID26696408
PMCPMC4917478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.