Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26696267›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2016

[Neuroanesthesia].

K Engelhard

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K EngelhardKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. engelhak@uni-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anesthesiological challenges during craniotomy result from the anatomically related low compensatory capacity of the intracranial space in response to increased volume and the low ischemic tolerance of brain tissue. The anesthetic agents used should therefore not increase the intracranial volume and improve the ischemic tolerance. An acute life-threatening increase of intracranial pressure can be temporarily treated by hyperventilation until measures, such as osmotherapy and infusion of intravenous anesthetics become effective. During an operation the homeostatic parameters including blood volume, blood pressure, partial pressure of carbon dioxide and oxygen in blood, plasma glucose concentration and core body temperature have to be closely monitored and kept normal (6 Ns). Optimal implementation of anesthesia necessitates a detailed knowledge of the surgical approach and potential complications. Postoperatively, patients should be extubated as soon as possible to closely monitor cognitive function so that potential deterioration can be detected.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaAnesthesiologyBrain EdemaCraniotomyHumansNeurosurgeryNeurosurgical ProceduresPerioperative CareAwake craniotomyBrain edemaCraniotomyIntracranial pressureSitting position

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.