Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26696229›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Girls' explanations for being unvaccinated or under vaccinated against human papillomavirus: a content analysis of survey responses.

Alice S Forster, Jo Waller, Harriet L Bowyer, Laura A V Marlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alice S ForsterHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. alice.forster@ucl.ac.uk.
Jo WallerHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. j.waller@ucl.ac.uk.
Harriet L BowyerHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. harriet.bowyer@ggc.scot.nhs.uk.
Laura A V MarlowHealth Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, UCL, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK. l.marlow@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17219Cancer Research UK 17429Cancer Research UK A13254Cancer Research UK C49896/A17429Cancer Research UK C7492/A17219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn England HPV vaccination is offered to all girls age 12-13 years, free-at-the-point-of-receipt, mostly in schools. Coverage is good, but around 20% of girls remain unvaccinated. This research sought to explore reasons for being un-/under vaccinated.

methodsAn ethnically diverse sample of girls aged 15-16 years attending one of twelve London schools completed a survey three years after being offered HPV vaccination. Girls reported their HPV vaccine status and those who were unvaccinated (had not received any doses of the vaccine) or under vaccinated (had not completed the recommended 3-dose course) recorded reasons for their un-/under vaccinated status. Reasons were reported using free-text and content analysis was used to analyse responses.

resultsAround 74% of un-/under vaccinated girls provided a reason for their vaccination status (n = 259). Among unvaccinated girls, the most common reasons related to lack of perceived need for vaccination, concerns about safety and lack of parental consent. Girls who were under vaccinated gave practical reasons, including the need for more information (e.g. not knowing that multiple doses were needed), administrative issues (e.g. school absence), health and procedural concerns (e.g. fear of needles). Descriptively, there were few differences in the reasons given between girls from different ethnic backgrounds. Girls from Black and Asian backgrounds more commonly thought that the vaccine was not needed. Lack of parental consent without providing further explanation was most often cited by girls from Black backgrounds.

conclusionsSafety concerns and lack of perceived need should be addressed to encourage informed uptake of HPV vaccination. Immunisation programme coordinators may be able to increase series completion by tackling practical problems facing under vaccinated girls.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorEnglandFemaleHumansLondonPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID26696229
PMCPMC4689042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.