Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694922›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2016

The Epidemiology of Male Breast Cancer.

Raina M Ferzoco, Kathryn J Ruddy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Review onGenes · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raina M FerzocoDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. ferzoco.raina@mayo.edu.
Kathryn J RuddyDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. ruddy.kathryn@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesKL2TR000136 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$6.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2TR000136-09NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast cancer is a rare disease, accounting for only 1% of breast cancer diagnoses in the USA. The current literature suggests that genetic factors including BRCA2 mutations, family history, age, androgen/estrogen imbalance, and environmental exposures may predispose to male breast cancer. In this manuscript, we will review known and possible risk factors for male breast cancer, as well as describe the clinical patterns of the disease.

Indexed as

MutationAgedAge FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA2 ProteinBreast Neoplasms, MaleCheckpoint Kinase 2Environmental ExposureEstrogensGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHamartoma Syndrome, MultipleHumansKlinefelter SyndromeMaleRisk FactorsSteroid 17-alpha-HydroxylaseBiomarkers, TumorBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanEstrogensSteroid 17-alpha-HydroxylaseBreast neoplasmsEpidemiologyMaleRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID26694922
OpenAlexW2213975839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.