ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016
Noninvasive Cardiac Imaging in Patients with Known and Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: What is in it for the Interventional Cardiologist?
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction in women with nonobstructive ischemic heart disease as assessed by positron emission tomography.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The long-standing coronary artery disease (CAD) paradigm simplified by the discrimination between patients with or without CAD warrants to be revisited by the insightful information provided by noninvasive cardiac imaging, leading to a comprehensive physiopathological assessment rather than a mainly anatomical approach. This review will address (1) the role of non-invasive cardiac imaging for the appropriate selection of stable patients referred to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), and the evolving concept and prognostic implications of myocardial ischemia; (2) the usefulness of computed tomography coronary angiography for the guidance of percutaneous coronary interventions; and (3) the role and potential clinical impact of novel anatomical and functional non-invasive prognostic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26694725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.