Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694547›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Intra-arterial administration improves temozolomide delivery and efficacy in a model of intracerebral metastasis, but has unexpected brain toxicity.

Leslie L Muldoon, Michael A Pagel, Joao Prola Netto, Edward A Neuwelt

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evans Blue Dye: A Revisit of Its Applications in Biomedicine.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2018
    Review
  12. Translational gap in ongoing clinical trials for glioma.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leslie L MuldoonDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, L603; 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Michael A PagelVeterans Administration Medical Center, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Joao Prola NettoDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, L603; 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Edward A NeuweltDepartment of Neurology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, L603; 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. neuwelte@ohsu.edu.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs · US

Funding

Two Compartment Models to Improve Brain Tumor TherapyR01CA137488 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEUWELT, EDWARD A. · 2008 to 2019
$7.3M
Opening of the Blood Brain Barrier to Antitumor AgentsR37NS044687 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEUWELT, EDWARD A. · 2002 to 2008
$3.5M
Opening of the blood-brain barrier to antitumor agentsR01NS044687 · NINDS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI NEUWELT, EDWARD A. · 2010 to 2014
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA137488NINDS NIH HHS NS44687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that intra-arterial (IA) infusion of temozolomide into the internal carotid artery would safely improve drug delivery to brain and enhance chemotherapy efficacy in a chemosensitive rat brain tumor model. Quantitative autoradiography after 25 µCi (14)C-temozolomide was given by oral, intravenous, or IA route of administration, or IA with osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption (BBBD) (n = 5-7 per group) showed that both IA and IA/BBBD administration increased drug delivery in tumor by over threefold compared to normal brain (P < 0.02), and also significantly elevated delivery throughout the infused right hemisphere. Temozolomide (20 mg/kg; ~150 mg/m(2)) increased median survival when given by oral (25.5 days), intravenous (25.5 days), or IA (33 days) route of administration, compared to 17.5 days in untreated controls (n = 8 per group; overall P < 0.0001). Survival time after IA temozolomide was significantly longer than all other groups (P < 0.01 for all comparisons). BBBD temozolomide was toxic in the efficacy study, but there was no evidence of symptomatic neurotoxicity in rats given IA temozolomide. After these promising animal results, a 49 year old male with glioblastoma multiforme who failed all standard therapy received temozolomide 100 mg/m(2) IA. Upon initiation of the second course of IA infusion the patient had increased heart rate, blood pressure, and rash, and the procedure was terminated without sequelae. Follow up IA infusion of temozolomide diluent in normal rats showed damaged cerebrovasculature as determined by dye leakage. These results demonstrate that IA infusion of temozolomide was toxic, with or without BBBD. We conclude that under the current formulation temozolomide is not safe for IA infusion in patients.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBlood-Brain BarrierBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineHumansInjections, Intra-ArterialLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeurotoxicity SyndromesRatsRats, NudeSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaTemozolomideAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineTemozolomideAnimal modelCase studyChemotherapyIntra-arterial infusion

Identifiers

PMID26694547
OpenAlexW2269473221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.