Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694478›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2015

A Label-Free Impedance Immunosensor Using Screen-Printed Interdigitated Electrodes and Magnetic Nanobeads for the Detection of E. coli O157:H7.

Ronghui Wang, Jacob Lum, Zach Callaway, Jianhan Lin, Walter Bottje, Yanbin Li

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. FeBiosensors · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recent advances in rapid pathogen detection method based on biosensors.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ronghui WangDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. rwang@uark.edu.
Jacob LumCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. jlum@pacificvetgroup.com.
Zach CallawayDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. zcallawa@uark.edu.
Jianhan LinCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China. jianhan@cau.edu.cn.
Walter BottjeCenter of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. wbottje@uark.edu.
Yanbin LiDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA. yanbinli@uark.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Escherichia coli O157:H7 is one of the leading bacterial pathogens causing foodborne illness. In this study, an impedance immunosensor based on the use of magnetic nanobeads and screen-printed interdigitated electrodes was developed for the rapid detection of E. coli O157:H7. Magnetic nanobeads coated with anti-E. coli antibody were mixed with an E. coli sample and used to isolate and concentrate the bacterial cells. The sample was suspended in redox probe solution and placed onto a screen-printed interdigitated electrode. A magnetic field was applied to concentrate the cells on the surface of the electrode and the impedance was measured. The impedance immunosensor could detect E. coli O157:H7 at a concentration of 10(4.45) cfu·mL(-1) (~1400 bacterial cells in the applied volume of 25 μL) in less than 1 h without pre-enrichment. A linear relationship between bacteria concentration and impedance value was obtained between 10(4.45) cfu·mL(-1) and 10(7) cfu·mL(-1). Though impedance measurement was carried out in the presence of a redox probe, analysis of the equivalent circuit model showed that the impedance change was primarily due to two elements: Double layer capacitance and resistance due to electrode surface roughness. The magnetic field and impedance were simulated using COMSOL Multiphysics software.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ImmobilizedBiosensing TechniquesCattleElectric ImpedanceElectrodesEquipment DesignEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli O157HumansImmunoassayLimit of DetectionMagneticsMagnetsRed MeatAntibodies, ImmobilizedE. coli O157:H7immunosensorimpedancemagnetic nanobeadsrapid detectionscreen-printed interdigitated electrode

Identifiers

PMID26694478
PMCPMC4697145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.