Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694353›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2015

Proteins and Their Interacting Partners: An Introduction to Protein-Ligand Binding Site Prediction Methods.

Daniel Barry Roche, Danielle Allison Brackenridge, Liam James McGuffin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Strategic Template Filtering Accelerates Fragment-Based Peptide Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmaceutical science advances · 2023
    Article
  11. Integrated Molecular Modeling and Machine Learning for Drug Design.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel Barry RocheInstitut de Biologie Computationnelle, LIRMM, CNRS, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34095, France. daniel.roche@lirmm.fr.
Danielle Allison BrackenridgeSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, UK. d.a.brackenridge@pgr.reading.ac.uk.
Liam James McGuffinSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, UK. l.j.mcguffin@reading.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidating the biological and biochemical roles of proteins, and subsequently determining their interacting partners, can be difficult and time consuming using in vitro and/or in vivo methods, and consequently the majority of newly sequenced proteins will have unknown structures and functions. However, in silico methods for predicting protein-ligand binding sites and protein biochemical functions offer an alternative practical solution. The characterisation of protein-ligand binding sites is essential for investigating new functional roles, which can impact the major biological research spheres of health, food, and energy security. In this review we discuss the role in silico methods play in 3D modelling of protein-ligand binding sites, along with their role in predicting biochemical functionality. In addition, we describe in detail some of the key alternative in silico prediction approaches that are available, as well as discussing the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP) and the Continuous Automated Model EvaluatiOn (CAMEO) projects, and their impact on developments in the field. Furthermore, we discuss the importance of protein function prediction methods for tackling 21st century problems.

Indexed as

Binding SitesComputer SimulationGene OntologyProtein BindingProtein Interaction MappingProteinsProteinsbinding-site residue predictionbiochemical functional elucidationbiological and biochemical role of enzymesenzyme commission numbersgene Ontologyprotein function predictionprotein–ligand binding site predictionsequence-based function predictionstructure-based function prediction

Identifiers

PMID26694353
PMCPMC4691145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.