Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694323›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection: benefits and challenges of a systematic knowledge translation project in Canada.

Katherine C Teela, Dane A De Silva, Katie Chapman, Anne R Synnes, Diane Sawchuck, Melanie Basso, Robert M Liston, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee, MAG-CP Collaborative Group

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katherine C TeelaSeattle University College of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, USA. kateteela@gmail.com.
Dane A De SilvaDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Dane.DeSilva@cw.bc.ca.
Katie ChapmanDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. kc.healthsci@gmail.com.
Anne R SynnesDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. asynnes@cw.bc.ca.
Diane SawchuckDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Diane.Sawchuck@viha.ca.
Melanie BassoDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. mbasso@cw.bc.ca.
Robert M ListonDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. robertliston@shaw.ca.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. pvondade@sgul.ac.uk.
Laura A MageeDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. LMagee@sgul.ac.uk.
MAG-CP Collaborative Group

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdministration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) to women with imminent preterm birth at <34 weeks is an evidence-based antenatal neuroprotective strategy to prevent cerebral palsy. Although a Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) national guideline with practice recommendations based on relevant clinical evidence exists, ongoing controversies about aspects of this treatment remain. Given this, we anticipated managed knowledge translation (KT) would be needed to facilitate uptake of the guidelines into practice. As part of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)-funded MAG-CP (MAGnesium sulphate to prevent Cerebral Palsy) project, we aimed to compare three KT methods designed to impact both individual health care providers and the organizational systems in which they work.

methodsThe KT methods undertaken were an interactive online e-learning module available to all SOGC members, and at MAG-CP participating sites, on-site educational rounds and focus group discussions, and circulation of an anonymous 'Barriers and Facilitators' survey for the systematic identification of facilitators and barriers for uptake of practice change. We compared these strategies according to: (i) breadth of respondents reached; (ii) rates and richness of identified barriers, facilitators, and knowledge needed; and (iii) cost.

resultsNo individual KT method was superior to the others by all criteria, and in combination, they provided richer information than any individual method. The e-learning module reached the most diverse audience of health care providers, the site visits provided opportunity for iterative dialogue, and the survey was the least expensive. Although the site visits provided the most detailed information around individual and organizational barriers, the 'Barriers and Facilitators' survey provided more detail regarding social-level barriers. The facilitators identified varied by KT method. The type of knowledge needed was further defined by the e-learning module and surveys.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that a multifaceted approach to KT is optimal for translating national obstetric guidelines into clinical practice. As audit and feedback are essential parts of the process by which evidence to practice gaps are closed, MAG-CP is continuing the iterative KT process described in this paper concurrent with tracking of MgSO4 use for fetal neuroprotection and maternal and child outcomes until September 2015; results are anticipated in 2016.

Indexed as

CanadaCerebral PalsyFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth PersonnelHumansInfant, NewbornMagnesium SulfateNeuroprotective AgentsPregnancyPremature BirthSocieties, MedicalTranslational Research, BiomedicalMagnesium SulfateNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID26694323
PMCPMC4688933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.