Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26694182›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up.

Austin Cottam, Daniel Cottam, Walter Medlin, Christina Richards, Samuel Cottam, Hinali Zaveri, Amit Surve

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02671331 (The Effect of Loop Duodenal Switch Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients on Weight Loss at One Year), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02671331 terminatednot on this map

The Effect of Loop Duodenal Switch Surgery in Morbidly Obese Patients on Weight Loss at One Year

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2016 to 2016Enrolled1ConditionsObesity, Type-2 Diabetes MellitusArmsLoop duodenal switch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Austin CottamBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Daniel CottamBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA. drdanielcottam@yahoo.com.
Walter MedlinBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Christina RichardsBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Samuel CottamBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Hinali ZaveriBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Amit SurveBariatric Medicine Institute, 1046 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
Reproductive Medicine Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (GBP) has been considered the gold standard for many years. The loop duodenal switch (LDS) is a relatively new procedure that simplifies the complexity of the duodenal switch (BPDDS) by making it a single anastomosis procedure while at the same time giving it more intestinal absorption to reduce the rates of malnutrition associated with traditional BPDDS. This paper seeks to compare the 18-month weight loss outcomes and complications of the more standard GBP with the newer LDS in a single US center.

methodsA retrospective matched cohort was analyzed on 108 patients who had either GBP (54 patients) or LDS (54 patients). Regression analysis was used to compare weight loss outcomes as measured by BMI and weight loss percentages. Complications gathered included bleeds, reoperations, diagnostic or therapeutic endoscopy (EGD), ulcers and chronic nausea.

resultsGBP and LDS have statistically similar weight loss at 18 months (39.6 vs 41 % weight loss, respectively). However, there were significantly more nausea complaints (26 vs 5), diagnostic endoscopies (EGD) (21 vs 3) and ulcers (6 vs 0) with the GBP than the LDS.

conclusionLDS has comparable weight loss results to GBP. However, LDS has fewer 30-day and 18-month complications and patients suffer from less nausea postoperatively.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassLaparoscopyWeight LossAnastomosis, SurgicalCohort StudiesDuodenumFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMatched-Pair AnalysisMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesEndoscopiesLoop duodenal switchMatch cohortNauseaRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID26694182
OpenAlexW2297340478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.