Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26693826›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2015

Assessment and prevention of behavioural and social risk factors associated with oral cancer: protocol for a systematic review of clinical guidelines and systematic reviews to inform Primary Care dental professionals.

Sweta Mathur, David I Conway, Heather Worlledge-Andrew, Lorna M D Macpherson, Alastair J Ross

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Micronuclei detection in oral cytologic smear: does it add diagnostic value?Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Comparison of Practices, Knowledge, Confidence, and Attitude toward Oral Cancer among Oral Health Professionals between Japan and Australia.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sweta MathurInstitution: University of Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. s.mathur.1@research.gla.ac.uk.
David I ConwayInstitution: University of Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. David.Conway@glasgow.ac.uk.
Heather Worlledge-AndrewInstitution: University of Glasgow Library, Glasgow, UK. Heather.Worlledge-Andrew@glasgow.ac.uk.
Lorna M D MacphersonInstitution: University of Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. Lorna.Macpherson@glasgow.ac.uk.
Alastair J RossInstitution: University of Glasgow Dental Hospital & School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ, UK. Alastair.Ross@glasgow.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco and alcohol are recognised as the major risk factors for both oral cavity (mouth) and oropharyngeal (throat) cancers, with increasing acceptance of the role of human papillomavirus (HPV) in the aetiology of oropharyngeal cancers. In addition, there is a significant increased risk for oral cancer among lower socioeconomic groups, males and older age groups. There is a growing evidence for the potential role of primary care professionals in smoking cessation and reducing alcohol-related harm. However, there are uncertainties about the best approaches/strategies to assess risk factors associated with oral cancer, effective components of preventive interventions for behaviour change and implementation strategies in primary care dental settings. Thus, in order to contribute to the prevention of oral cancer effectively, dental professionals need to assess patients on the major risk factors (tobacco, alcohol and HPV/sexual behaviours) and deliver appropriate prevention, taking into account the patient's sociodemographic context.

aimThe study aims to synthesise evidence on the best practice for undertaking an assessment of major behavioural risk factors associated with oral cancer and delivering effective behaviour change preventive interventions (e.g. advice, counselling, patient recall, signposting/referral to preventive services) by dental professionals in primary care dental settings.

methodThe study involves a systematic review and evidence appraisal. We will search for clinical guidelines and systematic reviews from the following databases: Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsychINFO, PubMed, TRIP and Google Scholar. We will also search websites of professional organisations/agencies and bibliographies/reference lists of selected papers. Quality will be assessed with the AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II) instrument for included clinical guidelines and the AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews) and ROBIS instruments for included systematic reviews. The best practice evidence will be assessed via a narrative synthesis of extracted data, considering publication quality. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will synthesise evidence on the best practice for oral cancer risk factor assessment and prevention and evaluate the relationship between available clinical guidelines and the review evidence base. This collation of evidence will be useful for making recommendations for future intervention, research and guideline development. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015025289.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHealth BehaviorRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSmokingClinical ProtocolsDentistryEthanolHumansMouth NeoplasmsOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomaviridaePrimary Health CareResearch DesignRisk FactorsSmoking PreventionEthanol

Identifiers

PMID26693826
PMCPMC4689050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.