Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26693728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Vital Signs Directed Therapy: Improving Care in an Intensive Care Unit in a Low-Income Country.

Tim Baker, Carl Otto Schell, Edwin Lugazia, Jonas Blixt, Moses Mulungu, Markus Castegren, Jaran Eriksen, David Konrad

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06051526 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The African Critical Illness Outcomes Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2023 to 2024Enrolled20,159ConditionsCritical Illness, Mortality
NCT06997328 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

'5 Rs to Rescue' A Cluster Trial With an Embedded Process Evaluation

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Cape TownRan2024 to 2026Enrolled6,000ConditionsSurgery, Failure to RescueArmsImplementation of the '5 Rs to Rescue'
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Improving surgical patients' safety in African hospitals: exploring healthcare professionals' experiences of Phase 1 of the '5Rs to Rescue' programme.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Development of a quality assurance tool for intensive care units in Lebanon during the COVID-19 pandemic.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim BakerDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Surgical Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Carl Otto SchellGlobal Health, Health Systems & Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Edwin LugaziaDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Jonas BlixtDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Surgical Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Moses MulunguDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Markus CastegrenDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Surgical Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jaran EriksenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
David KonradDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Surgical Services, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SELandstinget Sörmland · SEMuhimbili National Hospital · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal Critical Care is attracting increasing attention. At several million deaths per year, the worldwide burden of critical illness is greater than generally appreciated. Low income countries (LICs) have a disproportionally greater share of critical illness, and yet critical care facilities are scarce in such settings. Routines utilizing abnormal vital signs to identify critical illness and trigger medical interventions have become common in high-income countries but have not been investigated in LICs. The aim of the study was to assess whether the introduction of a vital signs directed therapy protocol improved acute care and reduced mortality in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) in Tanzania. METHODS AND

findingsProspective, before-and-after interventional study in the ICU of a university hospital in Tanzania. A context-appropriate protocol that defined danger levels of severely abnormal vital signs and stipulated acute treatment responses was implemented in a four week period using sensitisation, training, job aids, supervision and feedback. Acute treatment of danger signs at admission and during care in the ICU and in-hospital mortality were compared pre and post-implementation using regression models. Danger signs from 447 patients were included: 269 pre-implementation and 178 post-implementation. Acute treatment of danger signs was higher post-implementation (at admission: 72.9% vs 23.1%, p<0.001; in ICU: 16.6% vs 2.9%, p<0.001). A danger sign was five times more likely to be treated post-implementation (Prevalence Ratio (PR) 4.9 (2.9-8.3)). Intravenous fluids were given in response to 35.0% of hypotensive episodes post-implementation, as compared to 4.1% pre-implementation (PR 6.4 (2.5-16.2)). In patients admitted with hypotension, mortality was lower post-implementation (69.2% vs 92.3% p = 0.02) giving a numbers-needed-to-treat of 4.3. Overall in-hospital mortality rates were unchanged (49.4% vs 49.8%, p = 0.94).

conclusionThe introduction of a vital signs directed therapy protocol improved the acute treatment of abnormal vital signs in an ICU in a low-income country. Mortality rates were reduced for patients with hypotension at admission but not for all patients.

Indexed as

AdultCritical CareCritical IllnessFemaleHospital MortalityHumansHypotensionIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPovertyProspective StudiesRegression AnalysisTanzaniaVital Signs

Identifiers

PMID26693728
PMCPMC4687915
OpenAlexW2276647636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.