Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26693258›Full record

ArticleThe EPMA journal2015

Double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multicenter clinical trial (phase IIa) on diindolylmethane's efficacy and safety in the treatment of CIN: implications for cervical cancer prevention.

Levon Ashrafian, Gennady Sukhikh, Vsevolod Kiselev, Mikhail Paltsev, Vadim Drukh, Igor Kuznetsov, Ekaterina Muyzhnek, Inna Apolikhina, Evgeniya Andrianova

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The EPMA journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. 3,3'-Diindolylmethane Exhibits Significant Metabolism after Oral Dosing in Humans.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Phytochemicals in Gynecological Cancer Prevention.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Levon AshrafianRussian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, 86, Profsouznaya Str., Moscow, 117837 Russia.
Gennady SukhikhFederal State Budget Institution "Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 4, Akademika Oparina Str., Moscow, 117198 Russia.
Vsevolod KiselevFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (PFUR), 6, Mikluho-Maklaya Str., Moscow, 117198 Russia.
Mikhail PaltsevFederal State Budget Institution «Russian Academy of Sciences», 14 Leninsky av., Moscow, 119991 Russia.
Vadim DrukhFederal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Peoples' Friendship University of Russia" (PFUR), 6, Mikluho-Maklaya Str., Moscow, 117198 Russia.
Igor KuznetsovState Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Professional Education "Moscow State Medical Stomatological University named after A.I. Evdokimov" (MSMSU) of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 20 Delegatskaya Str., Build. 1, Moscow, 127473 Russia.
Ekaterina MuyzhnekCJSC "MiraxBioPharma", 12, Kutuzovsky av., Build. 2, Moscow, 121248 Russia.
Inna ApolikhinaFederal State Budget Institution "Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 4, Akademika Oparina Str., Moscow, 117198 Russia.
Evgeniya AndrianovaCJSC "IlmixGroup", 12, Kutuzovsky av., Build. 2, Moscow, 121248 Russia.
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUNational Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation · RUPeoples' Friendship University of Russia · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe article presents the results of a clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of a novel pharmaceutical composition in the form of vaginal suppositories containing diindolylmethane in the course of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I-II conservative treatment. It offers an attractive drug therapy for more personalized prevention of cervical cancer.

methodsA total of 78 women of reproductive age were included. This was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial with efficacy determined by histological evaluation of cervical biopsies. The efficacy of active drug treatment (100 and 200 mg/day) in both treatment groups was significantly higher in comparison with the placebo group, according to the primary efficacy end point (proportion of patients with complete CIN regression after 90-180 days of the study drug treatment).

resultsThe efficacies were 100.0 % (confidence interval (CI) 95 %: 82.35-100.00 %), 90.5 % (CI 95 %: 69.62-98.83 %), and 61.1 % (CI 95 %: 35.75-82.70 %), for the high dose, low does, and placebo, respectively. Adverse events in the placebo group were reported in 22 % of patients (CI 95 %: 7.5-43.7 %); in the first treatment group (100 mg/day), adverse events were reported in 40.0 % of patients (CI 95 %: 21.1-61.3 %); in the second treatment group (200 mg/day), adverse events were reported in 42.0 % of patients (CI 95 %: 22.1-63.4 %). The differences in side effects between treatment groups treated with the active drug and placebo were statistically significant. No serious adverse events were reported in any of the groups.

conclusionsThus, the use of diindolylmethane in the form of intravaginal suppositories can be effective in patients with CIN I-II and is not accompanied by clinically significant side effects. This approach could be a better option for young women with CIN I-II as it takes in attention their reproductive plans.

trial registrationID: ChiCTR-INR-15007497 (2 December 2015).

Indexed as

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCIN ICIN IIClinical trialDiindolylmethanePredictive preventive personalized medicineTargeted prevention

Identifiers

PMID26693258
PMCPMC4685602
OpenAlexW2204563631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.