ArticleJournal of materials chemistry. B2015
Spontaneous Helical Structure Formation in Laminin Nanofibers.
Article in Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring the Poisson's Ratio of Fibronectin Using Engineered Nanofibers.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Stretch-dependent changes in molecular conformation in fibronectin nanofibers.Biomaterials science · 2017Article
- Engineered Basement Membranes for Regenerating the Corneal Endothelium.Advanced healthcare materials · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Laminin is a cross-shaped heterotrimer composed of three polypeptides chains that assembles into an insoluble extracellular matrix (ECM) network as part of the basement membrane, serving a vital role in many processes such as embryonic development, differentiation, and muscle and nerve regeneration. Here we engineered monodisperse laminin nanofibers using a surface-initiated assembly technique in order to investigate how changes in protein composition affect formation and structure of the network. Specifically, we compared laminin 111 with varying degrees of purity and with and without entactin to determine whether these changes alter biophysical properties. All the laminin types were reproducibly patterned as 200 μm long, 20 μm wide nanofibers that were successfuly released during surface-initiated assembly into solution. All nanofibers contracted upon release, and while initial lengths were identical, lengths of released fibers depended on the laminin type. Uniquely, the laminin 111 at high purity (>95%) and without entactin spontaneouly formed helical nanofibers at greater than 90%. Atomic force microscopy revealed that the nanofiber contraction was associated with a change in nanostructure from fibrillar to nodular, suggestive of refolding of laminin molecules into a globular-like conformation. Further, for the high purity laminin that formed helices, the density of the laminin at the edges of the nanofiber was higher than in the middle, providing a possible origin for the differential pre-stress driving the helix formation. Together, these results show that variation in the purity of laminin 111 and presence of entactin can have significant impact on the biophysical properties of the assembled protein networks. This highlights the fact that our understanding of protein assembly and function is still incomplete and that cell-free, in vitro assays can provide unique insights into the ECM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.