Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26692721›Full record

ArticleMiddle East African journal of ophthalmology

A Community-based Eye Care Intervention in Southern Egypt: Impact on Trachomatous Trichiasis Surgical Coverage.

Ahmed Mousa, Paul Courtright, Arminee Kazanjian, Ken Bassett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Middle East African journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ahmed MousaDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia ; Department of Ophthalmology, Gluaocma Research Chair, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Paul CourtrightKilimanjaro Centre for Community Ophthalmology International, Division of Ophthalmology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa ; School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ; British Columbia Centre for Epidemiologic and International Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Arminee KazanjianSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Ken BassettBritish Columbia Centre for Epidemiologic and International Ophthalmology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to measure the impact of a community-based intervention on uptake of trichiasis surgery in Southern Egypt.

methodsFour villages where trachoma is endemic were randomly selected in the Samalout district, Egypt. Two villages were selected for intervention (intervention villages) and two matched villages for nonintervention (nonintervention villages). The intervention model provided community information sessions, door-to-door health education, screening, and improvements in the clinical capacity of eye care providers. The intervention was evaluated through two pre- and post-intervention community-based surveys that included the prevalence of trachoma and the utilization of eye care services at local hospitals. All patients with trichiasis answered a questionnaire regarding surgical utilization and barriers.

resultsIn the baseline survey, the trachomatous trichiasis (TT) surgical coverage was 22.7% (38.9% males, 16.7% females) in all villages. Following the intervention, the TT surgical coverage increased to 68% in villages that received the intervention (81.5% males, 60% females). Nonintervention villages had a TT surgical coverage of 26.1% (37.5% males, 20% females). In the intervention villages, the prevalence of TT significantly decreased from 9.4% (5.7% males, 11.8% females) to 3.8% (1.9% males, 5.1% females) (P = 0.013), in 2008. In nonintervention villages, there was a slight, but insignificant decrease in TT from 10.1% (3.1% males, 14.4% females) to 8.2% (3% males, 11.5% females) (P = 0.580). The major barriers to uptake of TT surgical services were: "Feeling no problem" (17.3%), "fear of surgery" (12.7%) and "cost" (12.7%).

conclusionA community-based eye health education program with door-to-door screening significantly increased the uptake of TT surgical services. Although improvements to the delivery of surgical service are essential, they did not lead to any significant improvements in the nonintervention villages.

Indexed as

Ophthalmologic Surgical ProceduresCorneal OpacityEgyptEyelidsFemaleHealth EducationHealth ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesTrachomaTrichiasisHealth EducationIntervention ModelSurgical UptakeTrachomaTrichiasis

Identifiers

PMID26692721
PMCPMC4660536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.