Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26692450›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2016

Female túngara frogs do not experience the continuity illusion.

Alexander T Baugh, Michael J Ryan, Ximena E Bernal, A Stanley Rand, Mark A Bee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander T BaughDepartment of Biology, Swarthmore College.
Michael J RyanDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin.
Ximena E BernalDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University.
A Stanley RandSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute.
Mark A BeeDepartment of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities.
Swarthmore College · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USTwin Cities Orthopedics · US

Funding

Sound Source Segregation R01DC009582 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BEE, MARK A · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009582NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC009582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans and some nonhuman vertebrates, a sound containing brief silent gaps can be rendered perceptually continuous by inserting noise into the gaps. This so-called "continuity illusion" arises from a phenomenon known as "auditory induction" and results in the perception of complete auditory objects despite fragmentary or incomplete acoustic information. Previous studies of auditory induction in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor and H. chrysoscelis) have demonstrated an absence of this phenomenon. These treefrog species produce pulsatile (noncontinuous) vocalizations, whereas studies of auditory induction in other taxa, including humans, often present continuous sounds (e.g., frequency-modulated sweeps). This study investigated the continuity illusion in a frog (Physalaemus pustulosus) with an advertisement vocalization that is naturally continuous and thus similar to the tonal sweeps used in human psychophysical studies of auditory induction. In a series of playback experiments, female subjects were presented with sets of stimuli that included complete calls, calls with silent gaps, and calls with silent gaps filled with noise. The results failed to provide evidence of auditory induction. Current evidence, therefore, suggests that mammals and birds experience auditory induction, but frogs may not. This emerging pattern of taxonomic differences is considered in light of potential methodological, neurophysiological, and functional explanations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAnuraAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleIllusionsNoiseSet, PsychologySoundVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID26692450
PMCPMC4738024
OpenAlexW2280152666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.