Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26692227›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Whole genome sequence and manual annotation of Clostridium autoethanogenum, an industrially relevant bacterium.

Christopher M Humphreys, Samantha McLean, Sarah Schatschneider, Thomas Millat, Anne M Henstra, Florence J Annan, Ronja Breitkopf, Bart Pander, Pawel Piatek, Peter Rowe and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Recent progress in engineeringSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Fishmeal Replacement byAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  8. Base editing enables duplex point mutagenesis inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  9. Deletion of genes linked to the CFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  10. Dietary Effect ofMetabolites · 2022
    Article
  11. Required Gene Set for Autotrophic Growth ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  14. Replacement of dietary fish meal withFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher M HumphreysBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. C.Humphreys@nottingham.ac.uk.
Samantha McLeanBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Samantha.McLean@nottingham.ac.uk.
Sarah SchatschneiderSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Sarah.Schatschneider@nottingham.ac.uk.
Thomas MillatBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Thomas.Millat@nottingham.ac.uk.
Anne M HenstraBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Anne.Henstra@nottingham.ac.uk.
Florence J AnnanBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. mrxfja@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Ronja BreitkopfBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. mrxrb14@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Bart PanderBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. mrxbp@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Pawel PiatekBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. mrxpp2@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Peter RoweBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. msxpr@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Alexander T WichlaczSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. pcxatw@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Craig WoodsBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. mrxcw4@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Rupert NormanBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. stxron@exmail.nottingham.ac.uk.
Jochen BlomBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Jochen.Blom@computational.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Alexander GoesmanBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, 35392, Giessen, Germany. Alexander.Goesmann@computational.bio.uni-giessen.de.
Charlie HodgmanBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Charlie.Hodgman@nottingham.ac.uk.
David BarrettSchool of Pharmacy, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. David.Barrett@nottingham.ac.uk.
Neil R ThomasSchool of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Neil.Thomas@nottingham.ac.uk.
Klaus WinzerBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Klaus.Winzer@nottingham.ac.uk.
Nigel P MintonBBSRC/EPSRC Synthetic Biology Research Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Nigel.Minton@nottingham.ac.uk.
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GBEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · GBUniversity of Giessen · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K00283X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium autoethanogenum is an acetogenic bacterium capable of producing high value commodity chemicals and biofuels from the C1 gases present in synthesis gas. This common industrial waste gas can act as the sole energy and carbon source for the bacterium that converts the low value gaseous components into cellular building blocks and industrially relevant products via the action of the reductive acetyl-CoA (Wood-Ljungdahl) pathway. Current research efforts are focused on the enhancement and extension of product formation in this organism via synthetic biology approaches. However, crucial to metabolic modelling and directed pathway engineering is a reliable and comprehensively annotated genome sequence.

resultsWe performed next generation sequencing using Illumina MiSeq technology on the DSM10061 strain of Clostridium autoethanogenum and observed 243 single nucleotide discrepancies when compared to the published finished sequence (NCBI: GCA_000484505.1), with 59.1 % present in coding regions. These variations were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and subsequent analysis suggested that the discrepancies were sequencing errors in the published genome not true single nucleotide polymorphisms. This was corroborated by the observation that over 90 % occurred within homopolymer regions of greater than 4 nucleotides in length. It was also observed that many genes containing these sequencing errors were annotated in the published closed genome as encoding proteins containing frameshift mutations (18 instances) or were annotated despite the coding frame containing stop codons, which if genuine, would severely hinder the organism's ability to survive. Furthermore, we have completed a comprehensive manual curation to reduce errors in the annotation that occur through serial use of automated annotation pipelines in related species. As a result, different functions were assigned to gene products or previous functional annotations rejected because of missing evidence in various occasions.

conclusionsWe present a revised manually curated full genome sequence for Clostridium autoethanogenum DSM10061, which provides reliable information for genome-scale models that rely heavily on the accuracy of annotation, and represents an important step towards the manipulation and metabolic modelling of this industrially relevant acetogen.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialClostridiumData CurationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMolecular Sequence AnnotationPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID26692227
PMCPMC4687164
OpenAlexW2202696179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.