Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26691885›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2015

Management of asymptomatic primary tumours in stage IV colorectal cancer: Review of outcomes.

Kate Jessica Wilkinson, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, Aflah Roohullah

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate Jessica WilkinsonKate Jessica Wilkinson, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, Aflah Roohullah, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Wei ChuaKate Jessica Wilkinson, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, Aflah Roohullah, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Weng NgKate Jessica Wilkinson, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, Aflah Roohullah, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Aflah RoohullahKate Jessica Wilkinson, Wei Chua, Weng Ng, Aflah Roohullah, Liverpool Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Creative Research Enterprises (United States) · USLiverpool Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare outcomes for patients presenting with stage IV colorectal cancer and an asymptomatic primary tumour, undergoing primary tumour resection (PTR) plus palliative chemotherapy vs primary chemotherapy up-front.

methodsA literature search was conducted using MEDLINE and EMBASE. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included perioperative mortality, morbidity and delayed surgical intervention rates in patients undergoing PTR and subsequent complication rates in patients with an un-resected primary tumour. Tertiary outcomes included impact on systemic treatment and identification of prognostic factors relevant for survival in this cohort.

resultsTwenty non-randomised studies met the inclusion criteria. Eleven studies included comparative overall survival data. Three studies showed an overall survival advantage for PTR, 7 studies showed no statistically significant advantage, and 1 study showed a significant worsening in survival in the surgical group. The perioperative mortality rate ranged from 0% to 8.5%, and post-operative morbidity rate from 10% to 35%, mainly minor complications that did not preclude subsequent chemotherapy. The rate of delayed primary-tumour related symptoms, most commonly obstruction, in patients with an un-resected primary tumour ranged from 3% to 46%. The strongest independent poor prognostic factor was extensive hepatic metastases, in addition to poor performance status, M1b stage and non-use of modern chemotherapy agents.

conclusionBased on the current literature, both PTR and up front chemotherapy appear appropriate initial management strategies, with a trend towards an overall survival advantage with PTR. The procedure has a low post-operative mortality, and most complications are transient and minor. The results of recruiting randomised trials are eagerly anticipated.

Indexed as

AsymptomaticChemotherapyColorectal cancerComplicationsPrimary tumourResectionUnresectable metastases

Identifiers

PMID26691885
PMCPMC4678398
OpenAlexW2255325301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.