Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26691535›Full record

Trial reportBMC psychiatry2015

Cost-effectiveness analysis of a communication-focused therapy for pre-school children with autism: results from a randomised controlled trial.

Sarah Byford, Maria Cary, Barbara Barrett, Catherine R Aldred, Tony Charman, Patricia Howlin, Kristelle Hudry, Kathy Leadbitter, Ann Le Couteur, Helen McConachie and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Cost Offset Associated With Early Start Denver Model for Children With Autism.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · 2017
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Caregivers' expectations of their non-verbal autistic children in rural KwaZulu-Natal.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2024
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah ByfordKing's Health Economics, Box P024, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. s.byford@kcl.ac.uk.
Maria CaryKing's Health Economics, Box P024, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. maria.1.cary@kcl.ac.uk.
Barbara BarrettKing's Health Economics, Box P024, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. barbara.m.barrett@kcl.ac.uk.
Catherine R AldredStockport NHS Foundation Trust, Stockport, SK2 7JE, UK. craldred@tiscali.co.uk.
Tony CharmanDepartment of Psychology, Box P077, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. tony.charman@kcl.ac.uk.
Patricia HowlinDepartment of Psychology, Box P077, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. patricia.howlin@kcl.ac.uk.
Kristelle HudryOlga Tennison Autism Research Centre, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia. k.hudry@latrobe.edu.au.
Kathy LeadbitterInstitute for Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. kathy.leadbitter@manchester.ac.uk.
Ann Le CouteurInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK. a.s.le-couteur@newcastle.ac.uk.
Helen McConachieInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK. helen.mcconachie@newcastle.ac.uk.
Andrew PicklesBiostatistics, Box P020, King`s College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK. andrew.pickles@kcl.ac.uk.
Vicky SlonimsEvelina Children`s Hospital, King`s College London, London, SE1 7EH, UK. vicky.Slonims@gstt.nhs.uk.
Kathryn J TempleInstitute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Sir James Spence Institute, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK. kathryntemple2000@yahoo.com.
Jonathan GreenManchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. jonathan.green@manchester.ac.uk.
PACT Consortium
King's College London · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBLa Trobe University · AUManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBStockport NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0401546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAutism is associated with impairments that have life-time consequences for diagnosed individuals and a substantial impact on families. There is growing interest in early interventions for children with autism, yet despite the substantial economic burden, there is little evidence of the cost-effectiveness of such interventions with which to support resource allocation decisions. This study reports an economic evaluation of a parent-mediated, communication-focused therapy carried out within the Pre-School Autism Communication Trial (PACT).

methods152 pre-school children with autism were randomly assigned to treatment as usual (TAU) or PACT + TAU. Primary outcome was severity of autism symptoms at 13-month follow-up. Economic data included health, education and social services, childcare, parental productivity losses and informal care.

resultsClinically meaningful symptom improvement was evident for 53 % of PACT + TAU versus 41 % of TAU (odds ratio 1.91, p = 0.074). Service costs were significantly higher for PACT + TAU (mean difference £4,489, p < 0.001), but the difference in societal costs was smaller and non-significant (mean difference £1,385, p = 0.788) due to lower informal care rates for PACT + TAU.

conclusionsImprovements in outcome generated by PACT come at a cost. Although this cost is lower when burden on parents is included, the cost and effectiveness results presented do not support the cost-effectiveness of PACT + TAU compared to TAU alone.

trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN58133827.

Indexed as

CommunicationAutistic DisorderChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Medical InterventionFemaleHealth ResourcesHumansMaleParentsPsychotherapySchoolsSocial Welfare

Identifiers

PMID26691535
PMCPMC4685630
OpenAlexW2199297329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.