Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26691426›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2016

Favorable long-term outcome of patients with multiple myeloma using a frontline tandem approach with autologous and non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation.

I Ahmad, R LeBlanc, S Cohen, S Lachance, T Kiss, G Sauvageau, D C Roy, L Busque, J-S Delisle, N Bambace and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

I AhmadDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
R LeBlancDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
S CohenDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
S LachanceDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
T KissDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
G SauvageauDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
D C RoyDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
L BusqueDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J-S DelisleDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
N BambaceDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
L BernardDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
W SabryDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
J RoyDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite survival improvement with novel agents and use of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), cure of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) remains anecdotal. Initial observations suggested that chronic GvHD was accompanied by an anti-myeloma effect after myeloablative HSCT, but unfortunately this procedure was hampered by high non-relapse mortality (NRM). To maximize the anti-myeloma effect and minimize NRM, we developed a non-myeloablative (NMA) regimen associated with a high incidence of chronic GvHD and tested its efficacy on patient survival and disease eradication. From 2001 to 2010, 92 patients aged ⩽ 65 years with a compatible sibling donor received autologous HSCT followed by an outpatient NMA allogeneic HSCT using a conditioning of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide. Patient median age was 52 years and 97% presented Durie-Salmon stages II-III disease. After a median follow-up of 8.8 years, probability of 10-year progression free and overall survival were 41% and 62%, respectively. Although the cumulative incidence of extensive chronic GvHD was high (at 79%), the majority of long-term survivors were off immunosuppressive drugs by year 5 and NRM was low (at 10%). Together, our results suggest that potential MM cure can be achieved with NMA transplantation regimens that maximize graft-versus-myeloma effect and minimize NRM.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningAdultAllograftsAutograftsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaProspective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26691426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.