Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26691310›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2016

Provider-to-Provider Communication during Transitions of Care from Outpatient to Acute Care: A Systematic Review.

Ngoc-Phuong Luu, Samantha Pitts, Brent Petty, Melinda D Sawyer, Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb, Romsai Tony Boonyasai, Nisa M Maruthur

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Empiricism as Change Agent.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ngoc-Phuong LuuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. nluu3@jhmi.edu.
Samantha PittsJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Brent PettyJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Melinda D SawyerJohns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cheryl Dennison-HimmelfarbJohns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Romsai Tony BoonyasaiJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nisa M MaruthurJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH IN HEART &VASCULAR DISEASET32HL007180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MARUTHUR, NISA M · 1985 to 2020
$11.4M
Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchKL2TR001077 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$9.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001077NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32HL007180-38NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost research on transitions of care has focused on the transition from acute to outpatient care. Little is known about the transition from outpatient to acute care. We conducted a systematic review of the literature on the transition from outpatient to acute care, focusing on provider-to-provider communication and its impact on quality of care.

methodsWe searched the MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for English-language articles describing direct communication between outpatient providers and acute care providers around patients presenting to the emergency department or admitted to the hospital. We conducted double, independent review of titles, abstracts, and full text articles. Conflicts were resolved by consensus. Included articles were abstracted using standardized forms. We maintained search results via Refworks (ProQuest, Bethesda, MD). Risk of bias was assessed using a modified version of the Downs' and Black's tool.

resultsOf 4009 citations, twenty articles evaluated direct provider-to-provider communication around the outpatient to acute care transition. Most studies were cross-sectional (65%), conducted in the US (55%), and studied communication between primary care and inpatient providers (62%). Of three studies reporting on the association between communication and 30-day readmissions, none found a significant association; of these studies, only one reported a measure of association (adjusted OR for communication vs. no communication, 1.08; 95% CI 0.92-1.26). DISCUSSION: The literature on provider-to-provider communication at the transition from outpatient to acute care is sparse and heterogeneous. Given the known importance of communication for other transitions of care, future studies are needed on provider-to-provider communication during this transition. Studies evaluating ideal methods for communication to reduce medical errors, utilization, and optimize patient satisfaction at this transition are especially needed.

Indexed as

CommunicationAmbulatory CareEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelHumansOutpatientsPatient Transfercare transitionscontinuity of careprovider-to-provider communication

Identifiers

PMID26691310
PMCPMC4803688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.