Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26691175›Full record

SynthesisRadiation oncology (London, England)2015

Adjuvant radiation therapy of regional lymph nodes in breast cancer - a meta-analysis of randomized trials- an update.

Wilfried Budach, Edwin Bölke, Kai Kammers, Peter Arne Gerber, Carolin Nestle-Krämling, Christiane Matuschek

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Exposure of the lungs in breast cancer radiotherapy: A systematic review of lung doses published 2010-2015.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of nodal staging between CT, MRI, and [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wilfried BudachDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany. wilfried.budach@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Edwin BölkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany. Boelke@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Kai KammersDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. kkammers@jhsph.edu.
Peter Arne GerberDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Duesseldorf, Germany. PeterArne.Gerber@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Carolin Nestle-KrämlingDepartment of Senology, Sana Krankenhaus Gerresheim, Dusseldorf, Germany. dr.nestle-kraemling@t-online.de.
Christiane MatuschekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany. matuschek@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdjuvant radiotherapy (RT) of regional lymph nodes (LN) in early breast cancer is still a matter of debate. RT increases the Overall survival (OS) rate of breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery and after mastectomy in patients with involved LN. The contribution of RT to regional LN to this improvement was poorly identified. Recently, the results of three large randomized trials addressing this question were published as full papers. MATERIAL AND

methodsPublished data of the MA.20 (n = 1832), the EORTC22922-10925 (EORTC) (n = 4004) trial and the French trial (n = 1334) were the foundation of this meta-analysis. Major eligibility criteria were positive i) axillary LN (all trials), ii) LN negative disease with high risk for recurrence (MA.20), and iii) medial/central tumor location (French, EORTC). The MA.20 and the EORTC trial analyzed the effect of additional regional RT to the internal mammary (IM) LN and medial supraclavicular (MS) LN, whereas in the French trial all patients received RT to the MS-LN and solely RT to the IM-LN was randomized. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS).

resultsRegional RT of MS-LN and IM-LN (MA.20 and EORTC) resulted in a significant improvement of OS [Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.88 (95 % CL 0.78 - 0.99)]. Adding results of the French trial and using a random effects model to respect the different design of the French trial, the effect on OS of regional RT remained significant [HR 0.90 (95 % CL 0.82 - 0.99)]. The absolute benefits in OS were 1 % in the MA.20 trial at 10 years, 1.6 % in the EORTC trial at 10 years, and 3.3 % in the French trial at 10 years (not significant in single trials). Regional RT of MS-LN and IM-LN (MA.20 and EORTC) yielded to a significant improvement of DFS [HR 0.86 (95 % CL 0.78 - 0.95)] and DMFS [HR 0.84 (95 % CL 0.75 - 0.94)].

conclusionAdditional regional RT to the internal mammary and medial supraclavicular LN statistically significantly improved DFS, DMFS, and OS in stage I-III breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26691175
PMCPMC4687086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.