Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26690943›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2015

Shoulder pain and disability index: cross cultural validation and evaluation of psychometric properties of the Spanish version.

Miguel David Membrilla-Mesa, Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas, Rocio Pozuelo-Calvo, Victor Tejero-Fernández, Lydia Martín-Martín, Manuel Arroyo-Morales

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06939530 (Comparision of Hydrodilatation Results at Different Volumes in Adhesive Capsulitis by Phases.), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06939530 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparision of Hydrodilatation Results at Different Volumes in Adhesive Capsulitis by Phases.

TypeinterventionalSponsorJavier Muñoz PazRan2025 to 2026Enrolled64ConditionsCapsulitis of Shoulder, HydrodilatationArmsHydrodilatation (20 ml), Hydrodilatation (40 ml)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. A Central Nervous System Focused Treatment Program for People with Frozen Shoulder: A Feasibility Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miguel David Membrilla-MesaPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Section Rehabilitation and Traumatology, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-VargasDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciencies, University of Málaga, Andalucia Tech, Instituto de Investigación en Biomedica de Malaga (IBIMA), Grupo de Clinimetria (F-14), Malaga, Spain. acuesta.var@gmail.com.
Rocio Pozuelo-CalvoPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Section Rehabilitation and Traumatology, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Victor Tejero-FernándezPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, Section Rehabilitation and Traumatology, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Lydia Martín-MartínDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Manuel Arroyo-MoralesDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Shoulder Pain Disability Index (SPADI) is a recently published but widely used outcome measure.

methodsThis study included 136 patients with shoulder disorders. SPADI was first translated and back-translated and then subjected to psychometric validation. Participants completed the Spanish versions of the SPADI, general health (SF-12), the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaires and a pain intensity visual analog scale (VAS).

resultsThe factors explained 62.8 % of the variance, with an internal consistency of α = 0.916 and 0.860, respectively. The confirmatory factor analysis showed a Comparative Fit Index of 0.82 and a Normed Fit Index of 0.80. The Root Mean Square Error of Aproximation was 0.12. The x (2) test for the 2-factor model was significant (x (2) = 185.41, df = 62, p < 0.01). The test-retest reliability was high, with an item ranging of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) from 0.89 to 0.93. The ICC for the total score was 0.91 (95 % CI 0.88 to 0.94). Measurement error by minimal detectable change (MDC)95 was 12.2 %. In the construct validity analysis, strong positive correlations were observed between Spanish Version of the SPADI and DASH (pain: r = 0.80; p < 0.01; disability: r = 0.76; p < 0.01). Moderate positive correlations were observed between Spanish Version of the SPADI and VAS (pain: r = 0.67; p < 0.01; disability: r = 0.65; p < 0.01). Moderate negative correlations were obtained between Spanish Version of the SPADI and SST-Sp (pain: r = -0.71; p < 0.01; disability: r = -0.75; p < 0.01). However, pain total Spanish Version of the SPADI was only weakly correlated with physical and mental components of SF-12 (both r = 0.40; p < 0.01).

conclusionsThis Spanish version of SPADI demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in a patient sample in the hospital setting.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAdultAgedCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsShoulder PainSpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26690943
PMCPMC4687317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.