ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2016
Determination of urinary catecholamines and metanephrines in cardiac deaths.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Trends in the Quantification of Biogenic Amines in Biofluids as Biomarkers of Various Disorders: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to measure catecholamines and their O-methylated metabolites in urine and vitreous humor collected in cardiac deaths and noncardiac control cases that underwent medicolegal investigations. Our first goal was to assess whether cardiac events of different types are characterized by different catecholamine/metanephrine urine and/or vitreous profiles. Our second goal was to determine whether noncardiac causes of death with different survival intervals are characterized by different catecholamine/metanephrine urine and/or vitreous profiles. Two study groups were prospectively and retrospectively formed, a cardiac death group (including three subgroups, according to the cause of death) and a noncardiac death group (including two subgroups, according to the length of the agonal period). Postmortem angiography, autopsy, histology, toxicology, and biochemistry were performed in all cases. First results seem to indicate that absolute values measured in urine and vitreous for each of the analyzed markers display no significant differences relating to each of the tested cardiac death subgroups. In the control group, absolute concentrations measured in urine and vitreous for each of the analyzed parameters failed to show significant differences relating to the length of agonal period. Our preliminary findings do not seem to confirm the conclusions of former studies and fail to corroborate the usefulness of urine catecholamine and metanephrine analysis to characterize stress response intensity or length of the dying process in the postmortem setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.