Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26690798›Full record

ArticleAnnals of intensive care2015

Clinical characteristics and outcome of very elderly patients ≥90 years in intensive care: a retrospective observational study.

Sophie Becker, Jakob Müller, Geraldine de Heer, Stephan Braune, Valentin Fuhrmann, Stefan Kluge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of intensive care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Very Elderly Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective and Observational Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sophie BeckerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. Sophie.Becker@stud.uke.uni-hamburg.de.
Jakob MüllerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. ja.mueller@uke.de.
Geraldine de HeerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. deheer@uke.de.
Stephan BrauneDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. Stephan.braune@sfh-muenster.de.
Valentin FuhrmannDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. v.fuhrmann@uke.de.
Stefan KlugeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University medical center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. skluge@uke.de.
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the overall prognosis of very elderly patients is generally limited, admissions to intensive care in these patients are often restricted. Therefore, only very few information is available on the prognosis of nonagenarians after intensive care treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcomes of very elderly patients (≥90 years) admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU).

methodsMonocentric, retrospective observational study of all patients aged ≥90 years admitted to the Department of Intensive Care Medicine with a total capacity of 132 ICU beds at the University Medical Center Hamburg in Germany between January 2008 and June 2013. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for 28-day outcome.

resultsA total of 372 patients ≥90 years of age were admitted to one of the departments ICUs. The majority of patients (66.7 %) were admitted as an emergency admission, of which half underwent unscheduled surgery. 39.8 % of patients required support by mechanical ventilation and vasoactive drugs, and 1.9 % of patients received renal replacement. ICU and hospital mortality rates were 18.3 and 30.9 %, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year after hospital discharge was 34.9 %. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed creatinine, bilirubin, age, and necessity of catecholamines as independent risk factors and scheduled surgery as protective factor for 28-day outcome.

conclusionNearly 70 % of patients aged ≥90 years were discharged alive from hospital following treatment at the ICU, and more than half of them were still alive 1 year after their discharge. The results suggest that 1-year survival prognosis of very old ICU patients is not as poor as often perceived and that age per se should not be an exclusion criterion for ICU admission.

trial registrationWF-0561/13.

Indexed as

Intensive careLong- term outcomeOver 90 years oldPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID26690798
PMCPMC4686461
OpenAlexW2217923868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.