ArticleJournal of comparative effectiveness research2016
Engaging stakeholders to design a comparative effectiveness trial in children with uncontrolled asthma.
Article in Journal of comparative effectiveness research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2018Pooled it
- Design of a pragmatic trial in minority children presenting to the emergency department with uncontrolled asthma: The CHICAGO Plan.Contemporary clinical trials · 2017Trial
- Coverage and quality of patient participation groups: a mixed-methods analysis of Care Quality Commission reports.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Article
- A survey of caregiver preferences regarding research participation in the paediatric emergency department.Paediatrics & child health · 2024Article
- Stock Inhalers: A Qualitative Data Analysis of Illinois Health Policy Trials and Triumphs.The Journal of school health · 2024Article
- Assessing patient partnership among emergency departments in France: a cross-sectional study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Coordinated Health Care Interventions for Childhood Asthma Gaps in Outcomes (CHICAGO) plan.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023Article
- Stakeholder engagement in eight comparative effectiveness trials in African Americans and Latinos with asthma.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- Engaging end-users in intervention research study design.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2018Article
- Care transition interventions for children with asthma in the emergency department.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2016Review
- Optimizing a Nurse-led Transitional Home Visit Program in Preparation for a Randomized Control Trial.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Childhood Asthma Disparities in Chicago: Developing Approaches to Health Inequities.Family & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2016
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo present the methods and outcomes of stakeholder engagement in the development of interventions for children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for uncontrolled asthma.
methodsWe engaged stakeholders (caregivers, physicians, nurses, administrators) from six EDs in a three-phase process to: define design requirements; prototype and refine; and evaluate.
resultsInterviews among 28 stakeholders yielded themes regarding in-home asthma management practices and ED discharge experiences. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation showed strong preference for the new discharge tool over current tools.
conclusionEngaging end-users in contextual inquiry resulted in CAPE (CHICAGO Action Plan after ED discharge), a new stakeholder-balanced discharge tool, which is being tested in a multicenter comparative effectiveness trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.