Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26690577›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Development of a Rhizoctonia solani AG1-IB Specific Gene Model Enables Comparative Genome Analyses between Phytopathogenic R. solani AG1-IA, AG1-IB, AG3 and AG8 Isolates.

Daniel Wibberg, Oliver Rupp, Jochen Blom, Lukas Jelonek, Magdalena Kröber, Bart Verwaaijen, Alexander Goesmann, Stefan Albaum, Rita Grosch, Alfred Pühler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genome Assembly and Genetic Traits of the Pleuromutilin-ProducerJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genome Analyses of the Less AggressiveJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel WibbergInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Oliver RuppBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Gießen University, Gießen, Germany.
Jochen BlomBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Gießen University, Gießen, Germany.
Lukas JelonekInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Magdalena KröberInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bart VerwaaijenInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Alexander GoesmannBioinformatics and Systems Biology, Gießen University, Gießen, Germany.
Stefan AlbaumInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Rita GroschLeibniz-Institute of Vegetables and Ornamental Crops, Großbeeren, Germany.
Alfred PühlerInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Andreas SchlüterInstitute for Genome Research and Systems Biology, CeBiTec, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bielefeld University · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhizoctonia solani, a soil-born plant pathogenic basidiomycetous fungus, affects various economically important agricultural and horticultural crops. The draft genome sequence for the R. solani AG1-IB isolate 7/3/14 as well as a corresponding transcriptome dataset (Expressed Sequence Tags--ESTs) were established previously. Development of a specific R. solani AG1-IB gene model based on GMAP transcript mapping within the eukaryotic gene prediction platform AUGUSTUS allowed detection of new genes and provided insights into the gene structure of this fungus. In total, 12,616 genes were recognized in the genome of the AG1-IB isolate. Analysis of predicted genes by means of different bioinformatics tools revealed new genes whose products potentially are involved in degradation of plant cell wall components, melanin formation and synthesis of secondary metabolites. Comparative genome analyses between members of different R. solani anastomosis groups, namely AG1-IA, AG3 and AG8 and the newly annotated R. solani AG1-IB genome were performed within the comparative genomics platform EDGAR. It appeared that only 21 to 28% of all genes encoded in the draft genomes of the different strains were identified as core genes. Based on Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and Average Amino-acid Identity (AAI) analyses, considerable sequence differences between isolates representing different anastomosis groups were identified. However, R. solani isolates form a distinct cluster in relation to other fungi of the phylum Basidiomycota. The isolate representing AG1-IB encodes significant more genes featuring predictable functions in secondary metabolite production compared to other completely sequenced R. solani strains. The newly established R. solani AG1-IB 7/3/14 gene layout now provides a reliable basis for post-genomics studies.

Indexed as

Expressed Sequence TagsGenome, FungalModels, GeneticBase SequenceMolecular Sequence DataPlant DiseasesRhizoctonia

Identifiers

PMID26690577
PMCPMC4686921
OpenAlexW2281987176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.