Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26690490›Full record

ArticleBiology direct2015

PEPstrMOD: structure prediction of peptides containing natural, non-natural and modified residues.

Sandeep Singh, Harinder Singh, Abhishek Tuknait, Kumardeep Chaudhary, Balvinder Singh, S Kumaran, Gajendra P S Raghava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology direct, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Roles of d-Amino Acids on the Bioactivity of Host Defense Peptides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. CancerPPD2: an updated repository of anticancer peptides and proteins.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Insight into Protein Engineering: FromCurrent pharmaceutical design · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sandeep SinghBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. sandysingh@imtech.res.in.
Harinder SinghBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. harinder@imtech.res.in.
Abhishek TuknaitBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. tuknait_abhishek@imtech.res.in.
Kumardeep ChaudharyBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. kumardeep@imtech.res.in.
Balvinder SinghBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. bvs@imtech.res.in.
S KumaranCSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. skumaran@imtech.res.in.
Gajendra P S RaghavaBioinformatics Centre, CSIR-Institute of Microbial Technology, Sec 39-A, Chandigarh, 160036, India. raghava@imtech.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past, many methods have been developed for peptide tertiary structure prediction but they are limited to peptides having natural amino acids. This study describes a method PEPstrMOD, which is an updated version of PEPstr, developed specifically for predicting the structure of peptides containing natural and non-natural/modified residues.

resultsPEPstrMOD integrates Forcefield_NCAA and Forcefield_PTM force field libraries to handle 147 non-natural residues and 32 types of post-translational modifications respectively by performing molecular dynamics using AMBER. AMBER was also used to handle other modifications like peptide cyclization, use of D-amino acids and capping of terminal residues. In addition, GROMACS was used to implement 210 non-natural side-chains in peptides using SwissSideChain force field library. We evaluated the performance of PEPstrMOD on three datasets generated from Protein Data Bank; i) ModPep dataset contains 501 non-natural peptides, ii) ModPep16, a subset of ModPep, and iii) CyclicPep contains 34 cyclic peptides. We achieved backbone Root Mean Square Deviation between the actual and predicted structure of peptides in the range of 3.81-4.05 Å.

conclusionsIn summary, the method PEPstrMOD has been developed that predicts the structure of modified peptide from the sequence/structure given as input. We validated the PEPstrMOD application using a dataset of peptides having non-natural/modified residues. PEPstrMOD offers unique advantages that allow the users to predict the structures of peptides having i) natural residues, ii) non-naturally modified residues, iii) terminal modifications, iv) post-translational modifications, v) D-amino acids, and also allows extended simulation of predicted peptides. This will help the researchers to have prior structural information of modified peptides to further design the peptides for desired therapeutic property. PEPstrMOD is freely available at http://osddlinux.osdd.net/raghava/pepstrmod/.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAmino AcidsDatabases, ProteinPeptidesSequence Analysis, ProteinAmino AcidsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID26690490
PMCPMC4687368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.