ReviewLasers in medical science2016
Low level laser therapy and hair regrowth: an evidence-based review.
Review in Lasers in medical science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microneedle technology integrated with diverse therapeutic modalities for hair regrowth in alopecia.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Convergent Regenerative Strategies in PM&R for Musculoskeletal and Hair Restoration: Integration of PRP, Exosomes, and Physical Modalities.Archives of internal medicine research · 2026Article
- Alopecia management from a comparative perspective: pharmacological and pharmaceutical insights in humans, dogs, and cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
- Human-Centric, Three Dimensional Micro Light-Emitting Diodes for Cosmetic and Medical Phototherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Lasers for treatment of androgenetic alopecia: an in-depth analysis.Lasers in medical science · 2025Review
- Exosomes derived stem cells as a modern therapeutic approach for skin rejuvenation and hair regrowth.Regenerative therapy · 2024Review
- Deciphering the molecular mechanisms of stem cell dynamics in hair follicle regeneration.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2024Review
- Surgical Management for Hair Restoration: A Review of Contemporary Techniques.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Review
- Bioactive Compound-Loaded Nanocarriers for Hair Growth Promotion: Current Status and Future Perspectives.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Low-Level Light Therapy and Minoxidil Combination Treatment in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Review of the Literature.Skin appendage disorders · 2023Article
- Advances in hair growth.Faculty reviews · 2022Review
- Head and Neck Restoration in Scar Alopecia: Hair Transplantation in Scalp, Eyebrows, Beard and Mustache.World journal of plastic surgery · 2021Article
- Photobiomodulation therapy for hair regeneration: A synergetic activation of β-CATENIN in hair follicle stem cells by ROS and paracrine WNTs.Stem cell reports · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Efficacy of Low-Level Laser Therapy.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2020Review
- Under the spotlight: mechanisms of photobiomodulation concentrating on blue and green light.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2019Article
- Several biological benefits of the low color temperature light-emitting diodes based normal indoor lighting source.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The Effect of Photobiomodulation Therapy on the Differentiation, Proliferation, and Migration of the Mesenchymal Stem Cell: A Review.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2019Review
- Activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling is involved in hair growth-promoting effect of 655-nm red light and LED in in vitro culture model.Lasers in medical science · 2018Article
- Effectiveness of Laser Therapy in the Management of Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis: A Systematic Review.Scientifica · 2016Review
- Acquired Resilience: An Evolved System of Tissue Protection in Mammals.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the current treatment options for different types of alopecia, there is a need for more effective management options. Recently, low-level laser therapy (LLLT) was evaluated for stimulating hair growth. Here, we reviewed the current evidence on the LLLT effects with an evidence-based approach, focusing more on randomized controlled studies by critically evaluating them. In order to investigate whether in individuals presenting with hair loss (male pattern hair loss (MPHL), female pattern hair loss (FPHL), alopecia areata (AA), and chemotherapy-induced alopecia (CIA)) LLLT is effective for hair regrowth, several databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Database were searched using the following keywords: Alopecia, Hair loss, Hair growth, Low level laser therapy, Low level light therapy, Low energy laser irradiation, and Photobiomodulation. From the searches, 21 relevant studies were summarized in this review including 2 in vitro, 7 animal, and 12 clinical studies. Among clinical studies, only five were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which evaluated LLLT effect on male and female pattern hair loss. The RCTs were critically appraised using the created checklist according to the Critical Appraisal for Therapy Articles Worksheet created by the Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Oxford. The results demonstrated that all the performed RCTs have moderate to high quality of evidence. However, only one out of five studies performed intention-to-treat analysis, and only another study reported the method of randomization and subsequent concealment of allocation clearly; all other studies did not include this very important information in their reports. None of these studies reported the treatment effect of factors such as number needed to treat. Based on this review on all the available evidence about effect of LLLT in alopecia, we found that the FDA-cleared LLLT devices are both safe and effective in patients with MPHL and FPHL who did not respond or were not tolerant to standard treatments. Future randomized controlled trials of LLLT are strongly encouraged to be conducted and reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement to facilitate analysis and comparison.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.