Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26690184›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Vulnerable Populations Perceive Their Health as at Risk from Climate Change.

Karen L Akerlof, Paul L Delamater, Caroline R Boules, Crystal R Upperman, Clifford S Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mental Health and Weather Extremes in a Southeastern U.S. City: Exploring Group Differences by Race.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen L AkerlofCenter for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. kakerlof@gmu.edu.
Paul L DelamaterDepartment of Geography and GeoInformation Science, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. pdelamat@gmu.edu.
Caroline R BoulesCenter for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA. cboules@masonlive.gmu.edu.
Crystal R UppermanUniversity of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, MD 20742, USA. cromeo@umd.edu.
Clifford S MitchellMaryland Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. cliff.mitchell@maryland.gov.

Funding

Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
PPHF-13-MARYLAND ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC HEALTH TRACKING ENHANCEMENTU38EH000944 · EH · MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH · PI MITCHELL, CLIFFORD S · 2011 to 2015
$4.4M
MARYLAND PUBLIC HEALTH STRATEGY FOR CLIMATE CHANGEUE1EH001049 · EH · MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH · PI MITCHELL, CLIFFORD S · 2012 to 2015
$963k
NCEH CDC HHS 2U38EH000944NCEH CDC HHS 5UE1EH001049NCEH CDC HHS U38 EH000944NCEH CDC HHS UE1 EH001049NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change is already taking a toll on human health, a toll that is likely to increase in coming decades. The relationship between risk perceptions and vulnerability to climate change's health threats has received little attention, even though an understanding of the dynamics of adaptation among particularly susceptible populations is becoming increasingly important. We demonstrate that some people whose health will suffer the greatest harms from climate change-due to social vulnerability, health susceptibility, and exposure to hazards-already feel they are at risk. In a 2013 survey we measured Maryland residents' climate beliefs, health risk perceptions, and household social vulnerability characteristics, including medical conditions (n = 2126). We paired survey responses with secondary data sources for residence in a floodplain and/or urban heat island to predict perceptions of personal and household climate health risk. General health risk perceptions, political ideology, and climate beliefs are the strongest predictors. Yet, people in households with the following characteristics also see themselves at higher risk: members with one or more medical conditions or disabilities; low income; racial/ethnic minorities; and residence in a floodplain. In light of these results, climate health communication among vulnerable populations should emphasize protective actions instead of risk messages.

Indexed as

Climate ChangePublic OpinionSocial PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMarylandMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUrban PopulationVulnerable Populationsclimate change communicationhealth risk perceptionsvulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID26690184
PMCPMC4690930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.