ArticleScientific reports2015
3D Image-Guided Automatic Pipette Positioning for Single Cell Experiments in vivo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole human-brain mapping of single cortical neurons for profiling morphological diversity and stereotypy.Science advances · 2023Article
- Smart imaging to empower brain-wide neuroscience at single-cell levels.Brain informatics · 2022Review
- Automated microscope-independent fluorescence-guided micropipette.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Harnessing non-destructive 3D pathology.Nature biomedical engineering · 2021Review
- Automatic deep learning-driven label-free image-guided patch clamp system.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Article
- Neuronal cell-subtype specificity of neural synchronization in mouse primary visual cortex.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Flexible Nanopipettes for Minimally Invasive Intracellular Electrophysiology In Vivo.Cell reports · 2019Article
- Visual physiology of the layer 4 cortical circuit in silico.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- Robotic Automation of In Vivo Two-Photon Targeted Whole-Cell Patch-Clamp Electrophysiology.Neuron · 2017Article
- Closed-Loop Real-Time Imaging Enables Fully Automated Cell-Targeted Patch-Clamp Neural Recording In Vivo.Neuron · 2017Article
- A robot for high yield electrophysiology and morphology of single neurons in vivo.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Imagining the future of bioimage analysis.Nature biotechnology · 2016Article
- Integration of autopatching with automated pipette and cell detection in vitro.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Article
- Progress in automating patch clamp cellular physiology.Brain and neuroscience advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a method to facilitate single cell, image-guided experiments including in vivo electrophysiology and electroporation. Our method combines 3D image data acquisition, visualization and on-line image analysis with precise control of physical probes such as electrophysiology microelectrodes in brain tissue in vivo. Adaptive pipette positioning provides a platform for future advances in automated, single cell in vivo experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.