Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26689460›Full record

SynthesisGlobal health action2015

Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review.

Sheila Cyril, Ben J Smith, Alphia Possamai-Inesedy, Andre M N Renzaho

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Global health action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05815030 (PrEP4Kink), which is not on this map. Cited by 250 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
250citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05815030 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

PrEP4Kink: Testing the Effects of an Interactive Educational Intervention on PrEP Uptake Among Kink-Involved Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Alternative Sexualities Health Research AllianceRan2023 to 2024Enrolled57ConditionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisArmsvideo informational/educational intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

250 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Addressing Power in Local-Level Policies and Programs to Reduce Health Inequities - A Systematic Review.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Measurement and evaluation of community engagement in complex, chronic medical conditions: HIV and obesity as exemplar conditions.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. COVID-19 Prevention Behaviors and Mistrust Among Black and Latino Public Housing Residents in NYC.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Empowerment in Obesity and Behavioral Weight-Management Programmes: A Scoping Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

190 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sheila CyrilDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Ben J SmithDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Alphia Possamai-InesedyOffice of the Pro-Vice Chancellor Arts (Education), Western Sydney University, Bankstown, NSW, Australia.
Andre M N RenzahoHumanitarian and Development Studies, School of Social Sciences and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia; Andre.Renzaho@westernsydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough community engagement (CE) is widely used in health promotion, components of CE models associated with improved health are poorly understood. This study aimed to examine the magnitude of the impact of CE on health and health inequalities among disadvantaged populations, which methodological approaches maximise the effectiveness of CE, and components of CE that are acceptable, feasible, and effective when used among disadvantaged populations.

designThe systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We carried out methodological assessments of the included studies using rating scales. The analysis focussed on model synthesis to identify the key CE components linked to positive study outcomes and comparative analysis between positive study outcomes, processes, and quality indicators of CE.

resultsOut of 24 studies that met our inclusion criteria, 21 (87.5%) had positively impacted health behaviours, public health planning, health service access, health literacy, and a range of health outcomes. More than half of the studies (58%) were of good quality, whereas 71% and 42% of studies showed good community involvement in research and achieved high levels of CE, respectively. Key CE components that affected health outcomes included real power-sharing, collaborative partnerships, bidirectional learning, incorporating the voice and agency of beneficiary communities in research protocol, and using bicultural health workers for intervention delivery.

conclusionsThe findings suggest that CE models can lead to improved health and health behaviours among disadvantaged populations if designed properly and implemented through effective community consultation and participation. We also found several gaps in the current measurement of CE in health intervention studies, which suggests the importance of developing innovative approaches to measure CE impact on health outcomes in a more rigorous way.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationHealth PromotionHealth Status DisparitiesVulnerable PopulationsCooperative BehaviorEthnicityHealth BehaviorHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMinority GroupsSocioeconomic FactorsUnited Statescommunity engagementculturally and linguistically diversedisadvantaged populationsethnic minoritieshealth

Identifiers

PMID26689460
PMCPMC4685976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.