ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2016
Long-term outcomes after treatment for T1 colorectal carcinoma.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of additional surgery versus surveillance-only clinical decision for early colorectal cancer patients after non-curative endoscopic resection: a meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2024Pooled it
- The impact of transanal local excision of early rectal cancer on completion rectal resection without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- [Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2020Guideline
- Predictive factors for isolated pulmonary metastasis in pathological T1 colorectal cancer following curative resection with lymph node dissection: a multicenter study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Surveillance and Surgical Salvage Treatment for Endoscopically Removed T1 Colorectal Cancers.Gut and liver · 2025Review
- Clinical outcome and long‑term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged 75 years or older: a retrospective observational study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Observational
- Lymphovascular invasion is a dominant risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T2 rectal cancer.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Vertical margin distance in T1 colorectal carcinoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection affects prognosis after additional surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Risk of recurrence in high-risk T1 colon cancer following endoscopic and surgical resection: registry-based cohort study.BJS open · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes after endoscopic removal of malignant colorectal polyps: Results from a 10-year cohort.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- [Prognosis Analysis of Additional Surgical Treatment for High-Risk T1 Colorectal Cancer Patients After Endoscopic Resection].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024Article
- Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in patients with severe comorbidities.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023Article
- Endoscopic resection alone as a potential treatment method for low-risk deep invasive T1 colorectal cancer.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023Article
- Long-term outcomes after endoscopic versus surgical resection of T1 colorectal carcinoma.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Vertical tumor margin of endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal carcinoma affects the prognosis of patients undergoing additional surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Risk Factors for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Submucosal Colorectal Cancer.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2022Article
- Patient outcomes after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer: a single-center, retrospective cohort study.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Long-term prognosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors in patients aged over 80 years.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Clinical significance of immunohistochemical lymphovascular evaluation to determine additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal T1 carcinoma.International journal of colorectal disease · 2021Article
- Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer.Intestinal research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLong-term outcomes of patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) treated by endoscopic resection (ER) or surgical resection are unclear in relation to the curative criteria in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines. The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the long-term outcomes among patients with T1 CRC in relation to the treatment methods.
methodsWe examined 322 T1 CRC cases treated between January 1992 and August 2008 at Hiroshima University Hospital. Patients who did not meet the curative criteria in the JSCCR guidelines were defined as "non-endoscopically curable" and classified into three groups: underwent ER alone (group A: 45 patients), underwent additional surgery after ER (group B: 106 patients), and underwent surgical resection alone (group C: 92 patients).
resultsOf the 322 T1 CRC patients, 79 were categorized as endoscopically curable and 243 as non-endoscopically curable. Among the endoscopically curable T1 CRC patients, recurrence and 5-year OS rates were 0 and 94.2%, respectively. In groups A, B, and C, recurrence rates were 4.4, 6.6, and 4.3%, and OS rates were 85.6, 95.1, and 96.3%, respectively (p < 0.05). Local recurrence or distant/lymph node metastasis was observed in 13 patients (group A: 2; group B: 7; group C: 4). Death due to primary CRC occurred in six patients (group B: 4; group C: 2).
conclusionLong-term outcomes support the curative criteria according to the JSCCR guidelines. ER for T1 CRC did not worsen clinical outcomes in cases that required additional surgical resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.