Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26689309›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2016

Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.

Peter C Gordon, Renske S Hoedemaker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rapid automatized naming (RAN): effects of aging on a predictor of reading skill.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter C GordonDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Renske S HoedemakerDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Max Planck Society · DEUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Linguistic Memory Representations: Behavioral & Neural AssessmentR01HD060440 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GORDON, PETER C · 2010 to 2013
$782k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060440NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060440-06A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid automatized naming (RAN) is strongly related to literacy gains in developing readers, reading disabilities, and reading ability in children and adults. Because successful RAN performance depends on the close coordination of a number of abilities, it is unclear what specific skills drive this RAN-reading relationship. The current study used concurrent recordings of young adult participants' vocalizations and eye movements during the RAN task to assess how individual variation in RAN performance depends on the coordination of visual and vocal processes. Results showed that fast RAN times are facilitated by having the eyes 1 or more items ahead of the current vocalization, as long as the eyes do not get so far ahead of the voice as to require a regressive eye movement to an earlier item. These data suggest that optimizing RAN performance is a problem of scheduling eye movements and vocalization given memory constraints and the efficiency of encoding and articulatory control. Both RAN completion time (conventionally used to indicate RAN performance) and eye-voice relations predicted some aspects of participants' eye movements on a separate sentence reading task. However, eye-voice relations predicted additional features of first-pass reading that were not predicted by RAN completion time. This shows that measurement of eye-voice patterns can identify important aspects of individual variation in reading that are not identified by the standard measure of RAN performance. We argue that RAN performance predicts reading ability because both tasks entail challenges of scheduling cognitive and linguistic processes that operate simultaneously on multiple linguistic inputs.

Indexed as

ReadingAdultColor PerceptionEye Movement MeasurementsEye MovementsHumansPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceSpeechYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26689309
PMCPMC4840059
OpenAlexW2130408529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.