ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance2016
Effective scheduling of looking and talking during rapid automatized naming.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Word Reading Fluency in Early School-Aged Children: A Pilot Eye-Tracking Study.Journal of eye movement research · 2026Article
- Gaze-Speech Coordination During Narration in Autism Spectrum Disorder and First-Degree Relatives.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- An In-Depth Investigation of Eye Movement Profile of Dyslexic Readers Using a Standardized Text-Reading Aloud Task in French.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Between-word processing and text-level skills contributing to fluent reading of (non)word lists and text.Reading and writing · 2025Article
- Complex network of eye movements during rapid automatized naming.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- RAN-related neural-congruency: a machine learning approach toward the study of the neural underpinnings of naming speed.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Rapid automatized naming (RAN): effects of aging on a predictor of reading skill.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2021Article
- A cross-cultural study showing deficits in gaze-language coordination during rapid automatized naming among individuals with ASD.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The Contribution of Oculomotor Functions to Rates of Visual Information Processing in Younger and Older Adults.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Individual differences in reading: Separable effects of reading experience and processing skill.Memory & cognition · 2020Article
- Article
- Using Serial and Discrete Digit Naming to Unravel Word Reading Processes.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Links between looking and speaking in autism and first-degree relatives: insights into the expression of genetic liability to autism.Molecular autism · 2018Article
- Reading ability and print exposure: item response theory analysis of the author recognition test.Behavior research methods · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Rapid automatized naming (RAN) is strongly related to literacy gains in developing readers, reading disabilities, and reading ability in children and adults. Because successful RAN performance depends on the close coordination of a number of abilities, it is unclear what specific skills drive this RAN-reading relationship. The current study used concurrent recordings of young adult participants' vocalizations and eye movements during the RAN task to assess how individual variation in RAN performance depends on the coordination of visual and vocal processes. Results showed that fast RAN times are facilitated by having the eyes 1 or more items ahead of the current vocalization, as long as the eyes do not get so far ahead of the voice as to require a regressive eye movement to an earlier item. These data suggest that optimizing RAN performance is a problem of scheduling eye movements and vocalization given memory constraints and the efficiency of encoding and articulatory control. Both RAN completion time (conventionally used to indicate RAN performance) and eye-voice relations predicted some aspects of participants' eye movements on a separate sentence reading task. However, eye-voice relations predicted additional features of first-pass reading that were not predicted by RAN completion time. This shows that measurement of eye-voice patterns can identify important aspects of individual variation in reading that are not identified by the standard measure of RAN performance. We argue that RAN performance predicts reading ability because both tasks entail challenges of scheduling cognitive and linguistic processes that operate simultaneously on multiple linguistic inputs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.