Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26689281›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2015

Examination of the mechanism of action of two pre-quit pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation.

Stuart G Ferguson, Julia A E Walters, Wenying Lu, Gudrun P Wells, Natalie Schüz

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nicotine receptor partial agonists for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stuart G FergusonSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. stuart.ferguson@utas.edu.au.
Julia A E WaltersSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. Julia.Walters@utas.edu.au.
Wenying LuSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. Wenying.Lu@utas.edu.au.
Gudrun P WellsSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia. gpwells@utas.edu.au.
Natalie SchüzSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 135, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia. Natalie.schuez@utas.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is substantial scope for improvement in the current arsenal of smoking cessation methods and techniques: even when front-line cessation treatments are utilized, smokers are still more likely to fail than to succeed. Studies testing the incremental benefit of using nicotine patch for 1-4 weeks prior to quitting have shown pre-quit nicotine patch use produces a robust incremental improvement over standard post-quit patch treatment. The primary objective of the current study is to test the mechanism of action of two pre-quit smoking cessation medications-varenicline and nicotine patch-in order to learn how best to optimize these pre-quit treatments. METHODS/

designThe study is a three group, randomized, open-label controlled clinical trial. Participants (n = 216 interested quitters) will be randomized to receive standard patch treatment (10 weeks of patch starting from a designated quit day), pre-quit patch treatment (two weeks of patch treatment prior to a quit day, followed by 10 weeks post-quit treatment) or varenicline (starting two weeks prior to quit day followed by 10 weeks post-quit). Participants will use study-specific modified smart-phones to monitor their smoking, withdrawal symptoms, craving, mood and social situations in near real-time over four weeks; two weeks prior to an assigned quit date and two weeks after this date. Smoking and abstinence will be assessed at regular study visits and biochemically verified. DISCUSSION: Understanding how nicotine patches and varenicline influence abstinence may allow for better tailoring of these treatments to individual smokers.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12614000329662 (Registered: 27 March 2014).

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAffectFemaleHumansMaleNicotinic AgonistsResearch DesignSmartphoneSmoking CessationSocial EnvironmentSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeVareniclineNicotinic AgonistsVarenicline

Identifiers

PMID26689281
PMCPMC4687305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.